Screenwriters - The Downtrodden Bottom-Feeders

Plot Device

A woman said to write like a man.
Registered
Joined
Apr 14, 2007
Messages
11,976
Reaction score
1,880
Location
Next to the dirigible docking station
Website
sandwichboardroom.blogspot.com
My favorite quote from this article:


The big question is why anyone would want to pursue a screenwriting career when they could earn decent money and a lot more respect writing for TV drama. If a TV script isn't working, the writer hunkers down with a script editor and delivers another draft. But with studio-financed films, chances are the project will be turned over to a different writer, with perhaps yet another writer brought in to polish the dialogue.

The screenwriter is thus often in the position of a mother whose child is taken into care against her will to be raised by someone else. Or, to put it another way, the screenwriter may start out thinking of himself (98 per cent of British films produced last year were written by men, but that's another story) as a fine craftsman, but then realises he's signed up to make the drawers in an Ikea factory.




First person singular: Why is the screenwriter the Cinderella of film?


To read the full article in its entirety:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2007/07/21/nosplit/bffps121.xml

Last Updated: 12:01am BST 21/07/2007




Screenwriters are solitary creatures who rarely get recognised for their achievements. Ellin Stein ponders why

If the film industry were an American high school, the actors would be the athletes and cheerleaders whom everyone wants to date, the director would be the cool kid everyone wants to be friends with, and the writer would be the bright but unprepossessing geek whose work everyone wants to copy but who never gets invited to parties.


Screenwriters are only too aware of this - just look at how, in films ranging from Sunset Boulevard (1950) through Barton Fink (1991), The Player (1992) and Adaptation (2002), they portray themselves as put-upon loners. Indeed, at a gathering (surely the collective noun is "an aggrievement") of screenwriters earlier this month, Oscar-winner and co-writer of Brokeback Mountain (2005) Diana Ossana said that "writers are considered bottom-feeders", while William Nicholson, whose script credits include Shadowlands (1993) and Gladiator (2000), began his keynote address by asking: "Why are we screenwriters so powerless? Why do we have such a lousy time?"

None the less, around 500 of these unfortunates paid upwards of £240 to attend the second annual Screenwriting Festival on the grounds of a Victorian estate outside Cheltenham, the only large-scale event devoted to feature-film screenwriting in the UK.

They polished their craft at workshops such as "Writing the Perfect Scene", got insights into the business at "Dealing With Hollywood", listened to established writers including Ossana and David Hare discuss the screenwriter's life at higher altitudes ("It's extremely painful and it never gets any better" was Nicholson's verdict), and networked, networked, networked.

Giving writers an excuse to get out of the house was one of the prime rationales behind the event's creation, said the festival's founder David Pearson: "It's a peculiar thing. Producers, directors, cameramen - everybody else meets up at something, but there's nowhere for screenwriters to meet. So they know hardly any other screenwriters and it's a pretty lonely job."

Released from solitary confinement, attendees ranged from bestselling authors with studio contracts to unproduced novices, all of whom mingled with remarkable camaraderie. For example, having paid his dues writing animated shorts and mobile phone content, Simon Biggs wrote a script that won him a place at the Berlin Film Festival's Talent Campus, where it was made into a short film. This led to him developing a feature for a German-American co-production.
 

Hollow

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 13, 2007
Messages
203
Reaction score
40
That is very interesting. I wish there was some place near me where I could meet other screenwriters in person. It is indeed lonely.
 

zahra

Was Zahra; lost profile - REBORN!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 5, 2018
Messages
2,037
Reaction score
426
Location
London
I know. There's always the Script Factory. I was a member for a year, but couldn't afford the dues again. It runs workshops etc, and is very good, but ( and it should be) it's expensive.

Anyone in the UK going to the Talent Circle's annual party on Monday? It's showing members' winning short films. Althought it's not solely for writers, it's a good networking chance, and you have a badge to declare what 'talent' you are, so we writers can collect into an aggrieved huddle, hogging the sausage rolls and giving dirty looks to the directors and swapping tales of madness. And it's only 6 quid. Fantastic!

You may have to join Talent Circle first, but that's a piece of p...

As for writers being bottom-feeders, well, twas ever thus, except in theatre and radio. We had a discussion here about it, and I really cannot think of one reason why this should be so. Jimmy McGovern (Cracker, Hilsborough etc) is doing a theatre piece about slavery - I wonder if he finds the difference in how he's regarded appreciable - or maybe he's too successful a writer for that to apply. I'll get my sister to ask him at some point (or I might do myself, if i make her take me to the opening night party).

Perhaps all writers should do a Russell T Davies and become producers, just to get some respect/say in their own work.
 

Hillgate

On location
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
1,322
Reaction score
114
Location
Europe
The sarcastic tone is this article is a shame. These are the SUCCESSFUL writers, and they are mistreated.

Hold on: successful writers get paid a ton of money. Writers like to cast themselves as the downtrodden (even the successful ones). It's because they will NEVER be treated as well as the director or the star, because the director or the star can sell the movie. 99.9999% of writers can't. They're not bankable. Without a suitable director on board and talent that shifts popcorn there's no finance, however good the script is!

Everything's relative. Oh to be treated as badly as Nora Ephron or William Goldman... ;)
 

icerose

Lost in School Work
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Messages
11,549
Reaction score
1,647
Location
Middle of Nowhere, Utah
I don't get this whole attitude of poor picked on scriptwriters and writers in general. Poor put on little me.

I don't remember anyone putting a gun to my head and saying "YOU MUST WRITE!" I write because I want to.

Maybe it's the whole anti-victim side in me but I do it because I want to. And if I ever feel that's a burden, doing something I want to do and living what I want to live in and people don't immediately start kissing my feet, or ever *ew* then shame on me.

There are many artists in many fields who recieve the same as us, why do we feel we're so special?
 

zeprosnepsid

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 24, 2005
Messages
1,006
Reaction score
90
Location
LA, unfortunately.
I think that writers are more likely to be poor (emotionally, not monetarily) and downtrodden because of their nature. Writing is solitary, perhaps even lonely. And is often sought by people who are not people-persons. Unlike acting and directing which is generally sought by more outgoing types.

I think you also find a lot of poor-me, bummed out editors too because in some cases they work alone in a basement for a long time. Editors and Writers both like to think they are the real unacknowledged auteur of the film too =)

But of course, these things don't apply to everyone.
 

Joe270

Banned
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
5,735
Reaction score
3,485
Location
Vegas, baby
At least writers can stay anonymous. I'd never want to live like actors live, especially the successful ones. No privacy, fearing for your children constantly, the whole downside is just horrible. They get paid more because they need to pay for bodyguards, etc. Directors are held responsible for the result. They put up with the prodcos and everyone else who has an axe to grind. If they screw it up, or allow it to be by the writer, the actors, etc, well, they won't work again. Takes some big shoulders to direct.

That said, I believe screenwriters aren't compensated as much as they should be, nor given the respect they deserve.
 

Inkdaub

wrapped in plastic
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 3, 2006
Messages
1,074
Reaction score
89
Location
Past where the river bends, past where the silo st
Hold on: successful writers get paid a ton of money. Writers like to cast themselves as the downtrodden (even the successful ones). It's because they will NEVER be treated as well as the director or the star, because the director or the star can sell the movie. 99.9999% of writers can't. They're not bankable. Without a suitable director on board and talent that shifts popcorn there's no finance, however good the script is!

;)

This is the closest to the truth I've read in this thread. It's about money at the root. The directors and the actors are more bankable than the writers and have thus been conditioned to believe they are more important.

A good example is the shit fit thrown by Innaritu and Garcia Bernal and the composer of Babel when Arriaga dared claim credit for the film he wrote. If Innaritu claimed credit...as he of course did and always does...noone blinks an eye.
 

javili

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 21, 2007
Messages
289
Reaction score
19
Location
Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico
One that got me was Steven Speilberg criticizing Ted Turner for colorizing movies. He said that it was a violation of the artistic rights of the director to change something in their film.

Have you ever heard a director say it's a violation of artistic rights to change the screenwriter's output?

Turner just swung a bigger bat than the directors, just like directors swing a bigger bat than writers. But he whines about it.
 

dclary

Unabashed Mercenary
Poetry Book Collaborator
Requiescat In Pace
Registered
Joined
Oct 17, 2005
Messages
13,050
Reaction score
3,525
Age
57
Website
www.trumpstump2016.com
Bet Spielberg wished he hadn't said that when he edited the guns out of ET's DVD.
 

scripter1

Article Queen
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
963
Reaction score
49
Location
Kitchen table, parked in front of the computer.
Now wait a second.

I thought that film was a collabrative effort and each person involved has their job.

We know as the writer we aren't supposed to do the director's job.
And we don't pick the actors, and we don't design the wardrobe or the sets.

When we sell the thing and put the money in our pocket we HAVE TO LET GO.

I don't have any gripe against all the money the faces of the film make.
The stars put in weeks, and months of work on it. Getting ready for the role, working weird hours on the film, being away from family, and then doing publicity.
And if the public doesn't like it THEY catch all the flack.

Nobody out in the real world CARES about us writers.
All they see, understand, or want to know about is what is up there larger than life on the BIG SCREEN.

(unless of course the viewer is also a screenwriter.)

I think EVERY writer aught to get full credit for the work they put in and proper payment. I think we deserve respect for being the minds and the talent that give everyone else in the industry a job.

And I think we need to accept our place in the system.

And face it, when it comes to changing things, the script ISN'T ours anymore. We SOLD IT.
 
Last edited:

Hillgate

On location
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
1,322
Reaction score
114
Location
Europe
I think we deserve respect for being the minds and the talent that give everyone else in the industry a job.

And I think we need to accept our place in the system.

IMHO your two statements contradict each other. The way you've described it, our place is at the top, as we're the 'job-providers.'

I know a few producers would would disagree very strongly with you on that score!
 

scripter1

Article Queen
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
963
Reaction score
49
Location
Kitchen table, parked in front of the computer.
Well,

I think that even though we create the source of all films, the BASIC STORY, no, we shouldn't be at the top.

Maybe that it should just be more equal in the industry.
That more stars should say "We had a great writer and I love doing so and so's work."

We sell our stories, and we SHOULD get credit, and then we go on and we write more stories.
And sometimes the other workers make it better, sometimes they make it worse.

Face it, writers don't sell to the general public.
We don't make tabloid drama happen.
We don't look good.
(okay, well, I look good.)

So, I think we should just make our own super stars within our own ranks.
I have dibs on the Jolie persona.
 
Last edited:

NikeeGoddess

Banned
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
1,896
Reaction score
103
true that many, many people are involved in the total production and most get little or no recognition except for that one little line in the exhaustive list of credits at the end. but i do believe the screenwriter deserves to be higher on the list. i'm sure editors, animators, cinematographers, etc have similar feelings. atleast they do recognize each department in the academy awards and the statue for the screenwriter weighs the same as the statue for the leading actor.

on the "glass is half full" side of the matter it's quite fortunate for the screenwriter that when a film goes sour the blame is usually given to the actors, directors, and producers in that order as well. the public doesn't talk about the crappy writer.
 

NikeeGoddess

Banned
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
1,896
Reaction score
103
true that many, many people are involved in the total production and most get little or no recognition except for that one little line in the exhaustive list of credits at the end. but i do believe the screenwriter deserves to be higher on the list. i'm sure editors, animators, cinematographers, etc have similar feelings. atleast they do recognize each department in the academy awards and the statue for the screenwriter weighs the same as the statue for the leading actor.

on the "glass is half full" side of the matter it's quite fortunate for the screenwriter that when a film goes sour the blame is usually given to the actors, directors, and producers in that order as well. the public doesn't talk about the crappy writer.