Now that the book is out:
It seems that Harry Potter, product of that whipping post of the so-called 'Religious Right' J.K. Rowling, is a CHRISTIAN ALLEGORY in the Lewis vein, and that Rowling refrained from discussing her Christianity "...because if I talk too freely about that, I think the intelligent reader, whether 10 or 60, will be able to guess what's coming in the books." (Interview with Max Wyman, Oct 26, 2000, printed in the vancouver Sun).
She said that in October of 2000, before Book 5 came out, before anybody besides her knew what a Horcrux was. Understand what she is saying: if we knew what she believes, we would be able to predict the storyline.
An excellent article on this may be found here:
Is Harry Potter the Son of God?
Now if this doesn't set the cat amongst the pigeons..
I predict that soon the 'Irreligious Left' will start savaging the series now, much as the 'Religious Right' did before...
But that's not the point of my thread; go to TIO if you want to argue that...
I am much more interested right now in whether or not this changes your opinion, (either way) about the series as a work of craft: Tolkien disliked allegory, he said, while his good friend Lewis made a career of it.
How creative is allegory? Is it harder to fashion a story de novo, or to come up with a way of retelling an old story, a way so fresh, in fact, that your intention may not be seen untill the very end?



It seems that Harry Potter, product of that whipping post of the so-called 'Religious Right' J.K. Rowling, is a CHRISTIAN ALLEGORY in the Lewis vein, and that Rowling refrained from discussing her Christianity "...because if I talk too freely about that, I think the intelligent reader, whether 10 or 60, will be able to guess what's coming in the books." (Interview with Max Wyman, Oct 26, 2000, printed in the vancouver Sun).
She said that in October of 2000, before Book 5 came out, before anybody besides her knew what a Horcrux was. Understand what she is saying: if we knew what she believes, we would be able to predict the storyline.
An excellent article on this may be found here:
Is Harry Potter the Son of God?
Now if this doesn't set the cat amongst the pigeons..
I predict that soon the 'Irreligious Left' will start savaging the series now, much as the 'Religious Right' did before...
But that's not the point of my thread; go to TIO if you want to argue that...
I am much more interested right now in whether or not this changes your opinion, (either way) about the series as a work of craft: Tolkien disliked allegory, he said, while his good friend Lewis made a career of it.
How creative is allegory? Is it harder to fashion a story de novo, or to come up with a way of retelling an old story, a way so fresh, in fact, that your intention may not be seen untill the very end?