This may sound like a dumb newbie question but. . .
Is there any traditional role where action fits into a chapter?
Of course, ideally, the entire book should be action. But I'm talking climactic stuff, the epic battles, the run in with zombie bounty hunters, but not necessarily the climax, i.e., of the entire book. In a chapter, is it appropriate for it to be where the author thinks it fits, whether that be in the beginning or middle? Or prolonged to the end of a chapter to keep the reader turning pages?
Not that I'm saying there is some kind of rule to this (a misconception with writing, as you know. Wait, then it's not a misconception. . .) but good books tend to have the order "action leading to climax-climax-resolution".
Again, I'm not saying there may or may not be a rule to this, but, while a man can lasso and saddle a duck, it takes very few to ride that duck and make it look damn good.
Is there any traditional role where action fits into a chapter?
Of course, ideally, the entire book should be action. But I'm talking climactic stuff, the epic battles, the run in with zombie bounty hunters, but not necessarily the climax, i.e., of the entire book. In a chapter, is it appropriate for it to be where the author thinks it fits, whether that be in the beginning or middle? Or prolonged to the end of a chapter to keep the reader turning pages?
Not that I'm saying there is some kind of rule to this (a misconception with writing, as you know. Wait, then it's not a misconception. . .) but good books tend to have the order "action leading to climax-climax-resolution".
Again, I'm not saying there may or may not be a rule to this, but, while a man can lasso and saddle a duck, it takes very few to ride that duck and make it look damn good.
