- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
- Messages
- 123
- Reaction score
- 6
Okay. I have a script that needs to be seen by a production company, preferably one interested in CGI based story lines. How should I go about pimping my script?
Place her under a dim street light at a busy intersection at night wearing see-through clothes and just the right amount of make-up to accentuate her features, and before you know it, you'll get an offer from a passerby....How should I go about pimping my script?
Okay. I have a script that needs to be seen by a production company, preferably one interested in CGI based story lines. How should I go about pimping my script?
Place her under a dim street light at a busy intersection at night wearing see-through clothes and just the right amount of make-up to accentuate her features, and before you know it, you'll get an offer from a passerby.
Is it a feature?
Is it an animated feature? Or a live action sci-fi/fantasy that needs a boat-load of CGI work?
Big budgets are a tough sell for an unproved writer unless you have something really awesome. And let's suppose you do have something incredible. In that case ...
Query. Query. Query.
But, it might be prudent to run your script past a few trusted beta-readers first. In fact, here on this web site there is a sub-forum called "Share Your Work" --and in there you'll find a sub-sub-forum just for movie scripts--where you can post small excerpts for peer review and feedback.
It is really, really, awesome. So who do I Query?
22. link removed via request from other site's Webmaster.
It is really, really, awesome. So who do I Query?
You still haven't mentioned if it is a full blown totally animation or real life with loads of CGI.
Which is it?
K
My vote is for Leprechauns / Gnomes & beavers.The problem with creating a G-rated CGI blockbuster, like Shrek, or Cars, is that all the obvious categories have been taken. Kids are interested in only a few things in their movies
...
Pixar has a new movie coming out about a rat that works in a kitchen. I’m sure it’s a fine film and will do well, as all other Pixar movies have. But honestly, my first reaction on seeing the rat in the kitchen trailer was “they ran out of creatures.” It’s no one’s fault. There are only so many types of creatures in the universe.
Scott Adams has an interesting article on his experience with a meeting at Dreamworks:
http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/the_dilbert_blog/2007/06/creative-questi.html
The main page of his blog is here:
http://dilbertblog.typepad.com
To quote a snippet:
My vote is for Leprechauns / Gnomes & beavers.
Mac
But this is the problem we all have. If there was a quick and easy way, we'd all use it. Then it wouldn't be quick and easy any more, it would be flooded and useless.What's funny. Is that my movie is PG 13 and has cursing and minor lude situations. It's really hilarious. It pains me to have good material and can't get it out there.
What's funny. Is that my movie is PG 13 and has cursing and minor lude situations. It's really hilarious. It pains me to have good material and can't get it out there.
Do you mean minor "lewd" situations -- as in sexual/naughty -- or "lude" as in "ludes" -- that is the drug?
In either case, there are certain things that you probably need to hear, though you probably won't like it (and maybe you're already shutting down, which would be unfortunate).
All CGI animated movies -- certainly those made by U.S. studioes, are extremely expensive, in the realm of 100 million dollars and more.
The people who even get to pitch these movies is an extremely small and exclusive club and they come from a whole different group from the people who pitch live action movies.
They come from the world of animators. Animation directors, producers, story people.
These projects generally start with presentations that consist of artwork -- character drawings, large scale artwork that gives the feeling of the style and key story moments.
They don't start with screenplays and certainly not with spec screenplays.
And on top of everything else, it's a a spec screenplay for a CGI feature that's going to be rated PG-13, which means that a lot of of prospective audience -- young children who'd go to a movie like Shrek, will not be going to this movie.
So -- big budget, unknown writer, project coming from a completely unfamiliar path in a sub-category of an industry that only makes a handful of movies every year and which, in addition, isn't even going to appeal to the full market range that every other U.S.-made CGI movie has so far aimed to reach.
Chances of it even being considered by anybody in a position to seriously evaluate it is essentially nil and beyond that, the chances that such a person, if that miniscule chance managed to happen, of buying the script and putting it into development is likewise essentially nil.
You are no doubt about to say that what tips the balance in your direction is how "fantastic" your script is.
The trouble is, there's "fantastic" according to your standards and there is "fantastic" according to the standards of your market.
And what is that market? Not the market of the people who go to see movies. Your market is the people who buy movies or, in this case, the people who buy CGI animation projects.
What is it that they are looking for? Are they looking for spec scripts? No. Are they looking for PG-13 projects that will restrict access to the finished film? No. Are they looking to take risks and strike out in new uncharted waters with a new uncharted writer and new uncharted approaches to creating hundred million dollar movies intended for mass entertainment and, traditionally intended for children and family audiences? Absolutely not.
They are looking for projects from experienced animation producer/directors who will be able to shepard those projects through to completion. They want people they know. People who have come up through the ranks, who have demonstrated, in practical terms, their ability to do the job. They want projects that are going to be immediately marketable and marketable to all four quadrants, if at all possible -- that is, children, teenagers, adult couples, older americans. You come up with a movie that hits all four quadrants (and a movie like for instance, The Impossibles, was a four-quadrant hit).
Barring that, they want family films. Kid friendly films. For these kinds of movies, that's the bread and butter.
And from what you're saying, you've giving them something else.
Hard though it may be to hear, and I know everybody will always give you the line about believing in yourself and never say die and all the rest, but at some point you have to come down (as a producer I know is always saying) to a point of reality.
That point is that the chances of this project selling are virtually non-existent.
The chances of most spec scripts by unsold writers are extremely small -- but even compared to those chances, the chances of this script selling (and I say this without have read a word or a line of it, but just based on the little you've said about it) -- is essentially non-existent.
Whatever virtues it may contain in an artistic or a narrative sense are simply not going to overcome the fundamentally market-driven basis upon which these movies are chosen and produced.
NMS
Well, lewd is too strong of a word. Just mature problems and situations. So even if I structure it as a four quadrant hit, I have no chance?