How bad is too bad?

Status
Not open for further replies.

heyjude

Making my own sunshine
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
19,740
Reaction score
6,192
Location
Gulf coast of FL
Inspired by other threads talking about character development: How bad does a character have to be before he is not redeemable?

My MC is Not a Nice Guy. And the harder he tries to be good, the scarier he gets. I'm wondering how far I can push it before the reader loses faith that he can redeemed.

Any thoughts?
 

Prawn

Writing is finite,revising infinite
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 28, 2006
Messages
2,361
Reaction score
429
Location
Beast Coast
I think that you can separate the character's actions from his feelings about those action. A book where a hit man gleefully whacks people is different book from one where a man has had to kill and feels horrible guilt about it. Your MC can do some pretty stinky things as long as he is remorseful.
 

Writer2011

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
5,209
Reaction score
331
Location
North Carolina
I'm not really sure but i've seen some pretty nasty characters---but you might not want to push him too far where he can't be redeemed...then again if that's what you're aiming for it's up to you.

Hope this helps :)
 

ChaosTitan

Around
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2005
Messages
15,463
Reaction score
2,886
Location
The not-so-distant future
Website
kellymeding.com
Inspired by other threads talking about character development: How bad does a character have to be before he is not redeemable?

This line will be different for every reader, but I agree with Prawn in that it depends greatly on how the character feels about his actions. And how the writer portrays those actions.
 

seun

Horror Man
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 3, 2006
Messages
9,709
Reaction score
2,054
Age
48
Location
uk
Website
www.lukewalkerwriter.com
Is it really about if a character can be redemmed? Or is it more important to focus on the character being interesting - whether they're good or bad?
 

Danger Jane

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 11, 2005
Messages
7,921
Reaction score
5,006
Location
Rome
I think it depends on the character. If the character is doing really despicable things, the reader is going to want to understand why, and if you can't get the motivation (and the humanity) of this despicable character across to the reader...that's a turn-off.

For me, a character can go around killing people NOT feeling guilty, as long as I understand why he's doing these horrible things.

I don't know if redemption is as necessary as humanization.
 

triceretops

Banned
Flounced
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
14,060
Reaction score
2,755
Location
In a van down by the river
Website
guerrillawarfareforwriters.blogspot.com
Call me kooky or behind the times, but I have never written an unsympathetic or nasty character into my storyline as the MC. The problems and conflicts that my MC faces are nasty. But I don't tilt him/her too far over the edge for fear of the reader or editor pulling away, unable to identify or empathize. Then again, this might wholly be one of those Man vs himself themes, and that he grows with enlightenment, which MIGHT justify his behavoir.

I'd have to know what genre this is, and just how bad the MC is. Is he one of the main characters, or is he in fact the main POV character?

Tri
 
Last edited:

janetbellinger

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
2,770
Reaction score
427
Location
Orangeville, Ontario
I think it's okay if the main character is nasty as long as he either grows as a person throughout the novel and atones for his actions or else ends up going to jail or otherwise incurring poetic justice.
 

Jay Byrne

Registered
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
28
Reaction score
3
Location
Dublin, Ireland.
If the character is believable and the reader understands the motivation for the actions then it's possible to have your MC do some really bad things in pursuit of justice/whatever.
The Dexter books by Jeff Lindsay are a good example of this.
 

NeuroFizz

The grad students did it
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
9,493
Reaction score
4,283
Location
Coastal North Carolina
I've said this in other threads of similar topic, but read The Name of the Game is Death by Dan J. Marlowe (old pulp classic, really a novella). His main character, Earl Drake, is a horrible person. Yet he gains reader sympathy because everyone around him is even worse.
 

JamieFord

giving resonant directions
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
275
Location
On Cloud 9
Website
www.jamieford.com
i think it depends on what you're going for. In Hannibal, there's a main character that's nasty, but somehow endearing.

But more literary reads, like Feast of Snakes by Harry Crews, you have a book where every character is pretty much detestable. The writing is brilliant, but the book is painful to read. Too painful for most people, I'm sure.
 

MarkEsq

Clever title pending.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 26, 2005
Messages
3,711
Reaction score
1,139
Age
59
Location
In the wilds of Texas. Actually, the liberal oasi
Not a book, obviously, but the MC in the show House has very few redeeming qualities whatsoever. And I'm not just talking about for a tv character.
I think he holds our attention, and sympathies, because we are curious about why he is like that. Is it because he is (a little bit) crippled? Is it because he still loves the wife he no longer has? Is it because he is tons smarter than all those around him and he can't understand what it is to be human and flawed (even though, of course, he is)?
 

KTC

Stand in the Place Where You Live
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
29,138
Reaction score
8,564
Location
Toronto
Website
ktcraig.com
I'm sorry, but does a character have to be redeemable?
 

JoNightshade

has finally arrived
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
7,153
Reaction score
4,142
Website
www.ramseyhootman.com
Not a book, obviously, but the MC in the show House has very few redeeming qualities whatsoever. And I'm not just talking about for a tv character.
I think he holds our attention, and sympathies, because we are curious about why he is like that. Is it because he is (a little bit) crippled? Is it because he still loves the wife he no longer has? Is it because he is tons smarter than all those around him and he can't understand what it is to be human and flawed (even though, of course, he is)?

Or is he just a total JERK? :) I love that show because they ride that line so well. Is he pitiable? Is he redeemable? Or should I hate his guts? I don't know! That's why I keep watching. They've made me WANT to believe that he's good, somewhere inside. And every now and then they offer me a teensy hint that MAYBE my hopes are justified. But never too much. Never enough.

Now that's damn good writing. (And acting and stuff.)
 

josephwise

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
287
Reaction score
36
Read American Psycho. Patrick Bateman does bad things. More than any character I've ever seen, in fact. He has no remorse, and he does nothing in the name of justice. And despite the title of the book, and other hints that he's crazy, he can't even be considered a mere "victim of insanity," because he remains completely accountable throughout the story.

But he's sympathetic. We can see some of ourselves in him. As others have said, it's the reader's ability to understand the MC that drives it all home.

Being interesting, or mysterious, just isn't enough. If the reader wonders why the MC does what he does, the reader must also be able, in part, to answer that question on his own.
 

triceretops

Banned
Flounced
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
14,060
Reaction score
2,755
Location
In a van down by the river
Website
guerrillawarfareforwriters.blogspot.com
I agree with the above. But evil just for the sake of evil is one-dimensional and hardly gratifying. There has to be some type of inner quality that we can identify with--what is the motivational driving force behind his/her actions that prompt them to this type of behavior?

In that movie The Unforgiven, Clint's character suffers from a violent past, full of alcohol abuse and outright murder. We see/invision his past via confessions in his dialogs. But. We know where he comes from, therefore we can (maybe) forgive him for his vicious killing spree at the end.

The Grinch--we know why he's an azzhole--persecution complex

Dirty Harry Calahan--he's a rule bender, but justice courage and loyalty are his shining attributes.

Tri
 

Feathers

emerging from the writing cave
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
1,071
Reaction score
123
Location
N/A ^_^
Website
www.headdeskforwriters.blogspot.com
I, too, agree with the above. However, I don't think its nessacary (or right) to throw in some horrible past just so your charecter has motive--thats cardboard to me. The charecter my not even know why he/she is doing all the crap he/she is doing.

But to answer the original question: I belive that when a charecter breaks thier own invisible boundries, thier own invisible rules, then they become un-redeemable. (sp?) When they stop having motive for what they are doing, and they know they are doing it without motive, then to me they've tipped over. If Jason murders Arriana in revenge, that makes sense. If Jason doesn't care one iota about revenge and just murder Arriana anyway, he is now un-redeemable.

I hope that makes sense.
 

heyjude

Making my own sunshine
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
19,740
Reaction score
6,192
Location
Gulf coast of FL
Thanks all... My MC is the POV narrator. He hates himself for what he does, but can't seem to get a grip on himself. He really believes he's a product of his environment and his genetics. In the end, he takes a good shot at redemption, but falls a little short.
 

heyjude

Making my own sunshine
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
19,740
Reaction score
6,192
Location
Gulf coast of FL
I'm sorry, but does a character have to be redeemable?

KTC: In my specific case, yes. But it's a great question. Personally, I think the general answer's no, but s/he dang well better be interesting :).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.