Re: consider this
for an example of what i was getting at was when you're printing out 800 pages to be sent in, it's perfectly reasonable to assume that sometimes you'll run out of a ream of paper and use the remnants of another stock which may be slightly different. or let's just say you screw up and your margins are a little longer or shorter. are these automatic death knells? or if you run out of ink on the last few words of a page if it's okay just to print them in. that kind of very minour thing. pink paper, yeah, i'd discard right off the bat, but shouldn't we expect an editor to be a reasonable person, too, and that triffling inconsistencies shouldn't signal a person's level of ability or desire to be published as opposed to a person not being wasteful or frivolous? true, there's an industry standard, and we should strive to meet those expectations, but at the same time we're human and despite our best efforts will screw up sometimes. a resume-length thing is one thing, but stretched out over the better part of a thousand pages, well, there's no fair comparison there, eh? heaven forbid there may be a coffee drop on the corner of one page that you can hardly see?