Publishers

NiennaC

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
615
Reaction score
91
Is it okay to query two publishers at once? And if a book is out to publishers, does that make an agent not want to consider it?
 

Cathy C

Ooo! Shiny new cover!
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 5, 2005
Messages
9,907
Reaction score
1,835
Location
Hiding in my writing cave
Website
www.cathyclamp.com
Is it okay to query two publishers at once?

Absolutely! Keep querying as many as you want until someone buys the book! Keep it reasonable, though. Start with five or six and once you hear back from most of them, send out another batch. Remember that publishers (editors really) are as much subject to taste as you are. What one hates, another will love. :)

And if a book is out to publishers, does that make an agent not want to consider it?

This is a yes and no. If a publisher makes an OFFER, an agent will want to see it. But if what you want is an agent, then you should try to get one BEFORE you start searching for a publisher. See, if a slush reader at the publisher didn't like something and rejects it, it'll be more difficult for an agent to contact the editor the slush reader works for to convince them that the editor WILL like it. After all, the slush reader is supposed to have the same taste as the editor. That's the point of hiring them as a first reader.

But, in reality--if the book is good enough, it really won't matter. When I was querying publishers for our first romance, it was rejected by the same company (Tor) that later accepted it when submitted by our agent. It can happen.

Personally, I'd say query a whole bunch of AGENTS to start, rather than publishers. There are a lot more doors open to you with a good agent (as many publishers are moving toward "agented submissions only.")
 

Maprilynne

Author Waiting in the Wings
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 26, 2006
Messages
1,026
Reaction score
340
Location
Cover-Delight-Ville
Website
www.powerfulbirth.com
When I was querying publishers for our first romance, it was rejected by the same company (Tor) that later accepted it when submitted by our agent. It can happen.

And I'd say it actually happens a lot. Having an agent will often be the difference between an optimistic and a pessimistic read. Also, just getting it past the intern who was given the task of reading slush can be a huge step. I wouldn't be surprised to see the scenario Cathy described happening often.
 

victoriastrauss

Writer Beware Goddess
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
6,704
Reaction score
1,318
Location
Far from the madding crowd
Website
www.victoriastrauss.com
A couple of other reasons to approach agents rather than publishers (if you're shooting for the bigger houses, that is--with smaller publishers, it's much more feasible to go unagented, and with small publishers that don't pay advances, an agent won't be interested):

Publishers' turnaround times for unagented submissions can be dauntingly long--a year, two years, even more. Agents can be slowpokes, but in general they are quicker to respond than publishers--often, a lot quicker.

You can query multiple agents at once. Some publishers require that you submit to them on an exclusive basis--even if it's only a partial.

- Victoria