Fish/Fishes Plural

Status
Not open for further replies.

Del

Sky isn't falling, ground is rising
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
4,048
Reaction score
1,781
Location
In a hole in the dark in a cold cold place
That is my understanding as well. But you might not want to understand things as I do, so seek further.


On the other hand, no one will protest the plural "fish" in most instances.
 
Last edited:

Jedi Dad

Writing with Force
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
126
Reaction score
28
Location
Arizona
Dictionary.com Unabridged
fish noun, plural (especially collectively
thinsp.png
) fish

(especially referring to two or more kinds or species
thinsp.png
) fish·es, verb
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm no scientist so I'll let an American scientist tell us about that field.

In common parlance, American Standard English will always use fish as plural while (whilst if you are British) British Standard English will always use fishes as plural.
 

Anne Lyle

Fantastic historian
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
3,469
Reaction score
399
Location
Cambridge, UK. Or 1590s London. Some days it's har
Website
www.annelyle.com
I'm no scientist so I'll let an American scientist tell us about that field.

In common parlance, American Standard English will always use fish as plural while (whilst if you are British) British Standard English will always use fishes as plural.

That's a new one on me! AFAIK, we use "fish" to mean a group of fish as a whole - e.g. "There are a lot of fish in that lake" - but "fishes" when we are thinking of them as individuals - e.g. "See those little fishes swimming around down there?"
 

ErylRavenwell

Banned
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
852
Reaction score
166
This issue came up in the "Post the Last Paragraph You've Written Today" Thread.

Fish plural:

It's "fish" when it's a single species, "fishes" when it's more than one species, right?

Not necessary a single species, but collectively as well. Fishes is basically similar to "peoples" as in distinctive groups (species for fish).
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Redfox,
I have no idea how you distinguish between the fishes "down there" and all the other fish in the lake that are not down there. Give me your best explanation of how you decide this one based on fish(es) that have emerged from the lake so they are neither among the great mass of fish in the lake nor are they "down there":

If there are a lot of fish in the lake and you catch three of them, have you caught three of those fish or did you catch three of those fishes?

(Please keep "those" in the sentence to identify the caught fish(es) as having been among the uncaught masses previously. Thanks.)
 
Last edited:

Soccer Mom

Crypto-fascist
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
18,604
Reaction score
8,039
Location
Under your couch
Fishy, fishy, fishy, fish.

Sorry. It needed saying. Ignore my derail.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.