Contraction for "You would have?"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sohia Rose

Will write for coffee
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
436
Reaction score
36
Location
United States
I was just writing a sentence. In my head, I said, '... creates a heightened experience, something that you'd've missed ...'

But when I tried to write it to paper, that you'd've (which should be "you would have") seemed funky. I don't think I've ever seen this written, which doesn't mean that it's not valid, so I like to check. However, saying the words out right, in full, seems a little too formal for my piece.

How can I rectify this? "You'd have?" "You would've?" Perhaps in my head, I meant, "you'd have" but I said it so fast. You think this has somethin' to do with my midwestern drawl? :Shrug:
 

Sohia Rose

Will write for coffee
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
436
Reaction score
36
Location
United States
I guess in my head, I'm chopping off the "h-a" in "have." Weird.
 

SpookyWriter

Banned
Joined
Nov 14, 2005
Messages
9,697
Reaction score
3,458
Location
Dublin
The contraction is "You would" like instead of "You would think" it becomes "You'd think".
 

Sohia Rose

Will write for coffee
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
436
Reaction score
36
Location
United States
In my head, what I've tried to do was combine all three. :) I've said it out loud a couple of times and the "h-a" is silent even in the "You'd have."

I wanted to make sure because where I live, sometimes people make fun of my accent and how I pronounce words. :tongue
 

Duncan J Macdonald

Plotting! Not Plodding!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,882
Reaction score
455
Age
69
Location
Northern Virginia
How about "you would've"? That would make your original sentence read:
'... creates a heightened experience, something that you would've missed ...'

Of course, if it's dialogue, then you'd've works.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
Contraction

It's either you'd have, or you would've. There's no reason at all to try turning three words into a single contraction. People may sometimes slur words and make such a sound, but on paper, stick to two word contractions.
 

veinglory

volitare nequeo
Self-Ban
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
28,750
Reaction score
2,937
Location
right here
Website
www.veinglory.com
I can see "you'd have" and "you would've"

you'd've is phoetically okay but we rarely transcribe dialogue phonetically. It's like writing everything in strict accent--harder to read.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Contractions are for painting a picture of speech but serve no real purpose otherwise. We represent them in writing dialog and for that purpose, your choice of "you'd've" is as good as Mark Twain's "Dog my cats ef I didn' hear sumf'n".
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Acceptance of contractions, as in acceptance of beauty, is in the eye of the beholder as it only represents what you hear. From Rogers and Hammerstein:

"I'm gonna wash that man right outta my hair"
 
Last edited:

Bartholomew

Comic guy
Kind Benefactor
Poetry Book Collaborator
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 2, 2006
Messages
8,507
Reaction score
1,957
Location
Kansas! Again.
'... creates a heightened experience, something that you'd've missed ...'

But when I tried to write it to paper, that you'd've (which should be "you would have") seemed funky.

This is colloquial, and I use it too--in speech. So in dialog, I think you could get away with it, but anywhere else, use something a bit more accessible.
 

kristie911

Happy to be here
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 17, 2005
Messages
4,449
Reaction score
2,461
Location
my own little world
Must be a midwestern thing...I say you'd've all the time and even though I would like to use it in dialogue, you're right it looks funky. I just use the two words instead. I don't want my reader to see you'd've and think, "What the hell is that?!" :)

They have plenty of other opportunities to say that when they're reading my work.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
Gonna

What about "gonna"? Has that become an acceptible contraction for "going to"?

"Gonna" isn't a contraction at all. It's a new, colloquial, word that means the same thing as "going to."
 

Gigi Sahi

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
67
Reaction score
5
Here in NY when I hear people contract "you would have" it comes out "you'da," as in: You'da thought he knew better by now.

Must be a Brooklyn-thang. :)
 

Gigi Sahi

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
67
Reaction score
5
Ah yes, talkwrite, I figured "you'da" musta originated in da South. After all, many Brooklynites (and other New Yorkers) got kinfolk down dere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.