Underlining characters' thoughts...or not?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Messages
47,985
Reaction score
13,247
How would you indicate characters' thoughts when they're broken up by tags? I know it's standard to underline where there are no thought tags, and to use normal type when you tag, but what about this:

Oh damn, Nichola thought. I don't know how to indicate thoughts.

Now, the second sentence is clearly a thought as the tag immediately precedes it in the same paragraph, but should I underline it, as it's a stand-alone sentence? Or leave it, as it's clear who's doing the thinking?
 

ErylRavenwell

Banned
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
852
Reaction score
166
If the rest of your manuscript is in the past tense, an abrupt change of tense to the present is a clear indication enough of a thought process. No need to underline (italicize)...or even tag.

Now, take everything I say with a pint of salt. I'm not that experienced; but this is what Belva Plain did in Evergreen.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
Thoughts

If a thought is important enough to show, rather than paraphrase, as in she thought she'd go to the store, then it's important enough to underline. Not underlining a direct thought means an interruption in flow. Even if the reader gets it because of tense, there's still a moment of questioning.

The rule of thumb is to work unimportant thoughts into the narrative, but underline the important ones.
 

ErylRavenwell

Banned
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
852
Reaction score
166
If a thought is important enough to show, rather than paraphrase, as in she thought she'd go to the store, then it's important enough to underline. Not underlining a direct thought means an interruption in flow. Even if the reader gets it because of tense, there's still a moment of questioning.

The rule of thumb is to work unimportant thoughts into the narrative, but underline the important ones.

Nod. The conventional way.
 

Elodie-Caroline

Banned
Flounced
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
1,021
Reaction score
186
Website
elodie.the.writer.tripod.com
I've got to be honest here Nichola, I don't like italics and so won't write in them. I do a lot of inner thought for my MCs and I don't underline them either. Because of the way I do my thoughts for my MCs, I asked the people who had read my MS if it was readable and understandable? They are ardent readers and said yes.
I actually found that writing thoughts as normal writing was perfectly ok to do in a book about editing your own novel too.


Elodie
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Messages
47,985
Reaction score
13,247
If a thought is important enough to show, rather than paraphrase, as in she thought she'd go to the store, then it's important enough to underline. Not underlining a direct thought means an interruption in flow. Even if the reader gets it because of tense, there's still a moment of questioning.

The rule of thumb is to work unimportant thoughts into the narrative, but underline the important ones.

So would you underline even when there's a thought tag? As in (for example):

I don't understand this, she thought. Underlining and italics confuse me.
 

dub

He ain't right...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
252
Reaction score
31
Location
in a strange damp place...with the slugs
I guess I am old school...hammered into me for years - thoughts are shown in italics without a tag; with a tag, no italics.

I turned quickly and stepped on her toe damn, I bet that hurts.
I turned quickly and stepped on her toe. I thought, damn, I bet that hurts.

my opinion...ten bucks and my opinion will get you a Starbucks coffee.
 

Mel

Never be completely back to normal.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
2,075
Reaction score
575
Location
Lovely, large cave
If you go that way then "Oh damn" should be too, since that's part of the thought. Me, I'd put a comma after Oh.

Oh, damn, Nichola thought. I don't know how to indicate thoughts.

That said, I like dub's advice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.