triceretops
When I first started out it took me about four years to write
a dozen novels. Five of them were circulated, via agent, with no luck. So I tried non-fiction--you know, put a different slant on a business, occupation or skill, or come up with a new subject?
Bang! First book sold. Bang! Second sold. Third, everybody wants it!
Now, it's been stated that non-fiction outsells fiction 3--1. That's because we're an information hungry nation. But I had no idea that small pub houses and university press were mad for the stuff. So I guess I was destined to be a science writer and I'll never get rid of that stigma. In my heart of hearts I want to write that novel, but when it comes to it, I guess I better stay where I have the most success.
I've also just read from many different sources that a good agented non-fiction book typically pulls $15,000 to $30,000
advance from a major house. Am I reading this right? Have I been away from it for that long? The smaller guys will get you $2,000 to $5,000 without an agent, all day long. And that's where I was. If big advances are typical today, I think I'll stay right here.
What are your thoughts about non-fiction v.s. fiction? Are we
really where the money is?
Are some people just better non-fiction writers than fiction writers? Is it because non-fiction requires more of a template and a little more organization is involved? Are we a certain breed? More clinical, less imaginative?
Thoughts?
Triceratops
a dozen novels. Five of them were circulated, via agent, with no luck. So I tried non-fiction--you know, put a different slant on a business, occupation or skill, or come up with a new subject?
Bang! First book sold. Bang! Second sold. Third, everybody wants it!
Now, it's been stated that non-fiction outsells fiction 3--1. That's because we're an information hungry nation. But I had no idea that small pub houses and university press were mad for the stuff. So I guess I was destined to be a science writer and I'll never get rid of that stigma. In my heart of hearts I want to write that novel, but when it comes to it, I guess I better stay where I have the most success.
I've also just read from many different sources that a good agented non-fiction book typically pulls $15,000 to $30,000
advance from a major house. Am I reading this right? Have I been away from it for that long? The smaller guys will get you $2,000 to $5,000 without an agent, all day long. And that's where I was. If big advances are typical today, I think I'll stay right here.
What are your thoughts about non-fiction v.s. fiction? Are we
really where the money is?
Are some people just better non-fiction writers than fiction writers? Is it because non-fiction requires more of a template and a little more organization is involved? Are we a certain breed? More clinical, less imaginative?
Thoughts?
Triceratops