Hi Rob,
I read your review, and it left me feeling a bit "not a book I would go out of my way to read". I don't know if that is what you intended. The review is bracketed with positive comments on the poems themselves, but the body of the review is not so supportive. I wonder if the balance really reflects your experience of reading the book.
Having 'masterpiece' on the cover and 'collectors item' in the preface are a bit over the top. An editor would have removed them before they saw the light of day. However, perhaps I would have ignored them had nobody pointed them out to me. No, that's not true, I would have seen them. They reminded me of an English student who was sent to me because he wanted to write short stories and I was the only published person his teacher knew. The first line of his story was, "Words can't describe how I felt when the ..." Getting rid of that first line was loud and clear on the agenda but the fellow was convinced of their truth and wouldn't hear of their removal.
In this case I thought perhaps the poet was a young bloke who hadn't quite got it when it comes to using words like 'masterpiece' on the front cover. However, I checked his blog and found that's not the case.
I would also have appreciated a few lines that appealed to you from the poetry itself. Your one example is for the opposite. So I am sitting here thinking of some crazy love poem lines, such as "I would like to find you in the shower and chase the soap for half an hour", or "She couldn't be, my well tooled love, a millimeter cuter". Trouble is, I've got an idea that the poems in this book take themselves much more seriously.
I suppose Mr Kei hasn't made a sale in my direction. On the other hand, had I not read your review I would not have John Fuller's lines rolling through my head,
"I'd like to have you in my power,
and see your eyes dilate,
I'd like to have your back to scour,
and other parts to lubricate."
Ah, love poems. Masterpieces, every one of them. Collector's items even.
Kim