Romance, old-style?

Status
Not open for further replies.

veinglory

volitare nequeo
Self-Ban
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
28,750
Reaction score
2,937
Location
right here
Website
www.veinglory.com
I would appreciate tips on where readers (and writers) could go for old styles of romance, particularly the super sweet and historicals with super-alpha males? I am thinking particulalry of the type of romance common from the late 70s to the mid to late eighties.

I have a feeling that there are smaller presses in particular may still produce these styles?
 

Jersey Chick

Up all night to get Loki
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
12,326
Reaction score
4,292
Location
in the state of carefully controlled chaos
For historicals - one of the classic "Bodice-rippers" is Kathleen Woodiwiss's The Flame and the Flower. It's one of my favorites, though feminists today would shred it because the hero initially forces himself on the heroine (but it all works out in the end, of course ;)) A few of Johanna Lindsey's earlier books are probably considered the same type - with alpha-alpha males.

For sweet, maybe Georgette Heyer? I'm not sure. I have to confess I've never read one. Possibly Barbara Cartlandt as well.

I should probably go and read a few myself. :)
 

Dawno

Shiny!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
11,261
Reaction score
3,280
Age
68
Location
someplace around here, anyone seen my keys?
Beverly Romance on Biblio.com - source for used books, listings by decade is one place.

eBay has lots (as in a group, not quantity) of the older numbered Harlequins for sale at $1.99 plus shipping.

There's an interesting abstract at JSTOR Gender, Popular Culture, and Curriculum: Adolescent Romance Novels as Gender Text by Linda K. Christian-Smith

that's about as far as my Googlefu takes me right now...
 

veinglory

volitare nequeo
Self-Ban
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
28,750
Reaction score
2,937
Location
right here
Website
www.veinglory.com
Thanks for those suggestions :) I was thinking more of publishers that are still producing new works in this mould?
 

Cathy C

Ooo! Shiny new cover!
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 5, 2005
Messages
9,907
Reaction score
1,835
Location
Hiding in my writing cave
Website
www.cathyclamp.com
They're calling these "Traditional" romances, ala Mills & Boon (although that's not the only thing M&B is publishing nowadays.) The RITA award has a special section for Traditional Romances. You might pick up this years finalists to see if they're what you're looking for (and if they are, checking out the past couple of years' finalists will give you the names of additional publishers/authors. In this year's award, it seems that Harlequin has the only contenders, but last year, Dorchester had two on the finalist list. Here's the 2007 list from the RWA website: :)

2007 RITA for Best Traditional Romance Finalists
A Woman Worth Loving by Jackie Braun
Harlequin Enterprises, Romance - (0373038976)
Stacy Boyd, editor

Claiming His Family by Barbara Hannay
Harlequin Mills & Boon, Romance - (373039077)
Kimberley Young, editor

Blind-Date Marriage by Fiona Harper
Harlequin Mills & Boon, Romance - (9780263849417)Kimberley Young, editor

The Doctor's Proposal by Marion Lennox
Harlequin Enterprises, Romance - (373038968)
Sheila Hodgson, editor

The Surgeon's Family Miracle by Marion Lennox
Harlequin Mills & Boon, Medical Romance - (9780263852196)
Sheila Hodgson, editor

Domesticating Luc by Sandra Paul
Harlequin Enterprises, Silhouette Romance - (0373198027)
Mary-Theresa Hussey, editor


Hope that helps! :)
 

Susan Gable

Dreamer of dreams, teller of tales
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
3,110
Reaction score
755
Location
Pennsylvania
Website
www.susangable.com
Yes, the Romance line has a lot of those Alpha males (sorry, most of the ones in those kinds of stories I want to just slap. <G>) in their stories. Presents, same thing.

I don't believe there has to be no sex though. Traditionals can have sex, so if you're looking for something strictly sweet, you'll have to watch what you choose.

Susan G.
 

JanDarby

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
3,553
Reaction score
1,121
Avalon does the super-sweet stuff still. And I was going to say Presents for the hyper-alpha too, but they're contemporary of course, not historical.

Anne Stuart might qualify for the hyper-alpha, in both contemporary and historical, but her style has remained modern, despite the alpha heroes.

Oh, hey, what about Diana Palmer? She used to write hyper-alpha, very traditional May-December romances, and I know she's still publishing, but I haven't read one of her books in years, so I don't know if her style has changed at all.

JD
 

Namatu

Lost in mental space.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Messages
4,489
Reaction score
968
Location
Someplace else.
Linda Howard's older work? Or am I thinking Elizabeth Lowell?
 

kikazaru

Benefactor Member
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
2,143
Reaction score
435
Georgette Heyer (my absolute favourite author of all time and queen of the historical romance) I don't think I would place in that category. She did historical (specifically Regency) but most are not traditional "alpha" male/subordinate female. They are quite light and frothy and the men are certainly masculine, but the women have substance - surprising for that time.

A similar author is Clare Darcy.
 

AnneWhitfield

Registered
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Messages
30
Reaction score
3
Location
Australia
Website
www.annewhitfield.com
Some of the smaller press will do those type of romances, as well as the larger publishers.
(Personally I don't read any book where the 'hero' rapes the heroine. You can have a strong hero without the need to have him be a rapist like in the old bodice rippers.)

Sweet romance doesn't mean the story has no strength or strong characters.

Try The Wild Rose Press, Highland Press, Vintage Romance Publishing, Enspiren Press and other small press publishers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.