No, but . . . what's the point in asserting copyright, unless there's a clause in your contract that specifies who retains copyright?
I'm not exactly sure myself, other than, as I mentioned, my natural tendency to want to retain rights whenever possible.
I was just creating a style template for my own use and considered putting copyright info in the front. I'm trying to weigh the value of retaining copyright vs. the knee-jerk reaction of clients who don't understand copyright or who intelligently question my keeping it, and all the other factors.
Voluntarily treating it as WFH and pointing out that you're giving the client copyright to non-copyright-knowledgeable clients might present a more professional and informed image. Does that overcome any minor benefit of retaining copyright?
Often on AW, when I post a question, it seems that I'm reinventing the wheel: somebody comes right along and links me to a 30-page discussion. I half expected somebody to say "Oh, you never do that. Here's why."
Right now I'm not seeing much value in the copyright for me. Any opposition to that point of view?