everything's subjective, or is it subjunctive?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Prawn

Writing is finite,revising infinite
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 28, 2006
Messages
2,361
Reaction score
429
Location
Beast Coast
[FONT=&quot]Pick one!
On his first trip to Gaza, Akiva had felt as if he were/was in a movie and someone had slowed down the action.[/FONT]
 

Flay

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 13, 2007
Messages
103
Reaction score
22
Location
Vancouver Island
I'd say were; but I'm a Canuck, & for some reason we seem to be especially fond of the subjunctive mood. Theodore Bernstein said thirty years ago that the subjunctive was vanishing from written English. It's not quite dead yet, though.
 

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
In this case, I would go with "were" (subjunctive). The fact is that he is NOT in a movie with slow motion.
 

Prawn

Writing is finite,revising infinite
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 28, 2006
Messages
2,361
Reaction score
429
Location
Beast Coast
Thanks, that's what I thought too. I shouldn't have listened to MS Word's grammar check.
P
 

Tish Davidson

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,626
Reaction score
110
Were. It's subjunctive contrary to fact. He is not actually in a movie.
 

Deleted member 42

Were, dude. Totally. I know it seems odd since were is usually plural, but . . . it's the subjunctive form.
 

Maryn

I Tried
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
64,020
Reaction score
42,883
Location
Behind you!
I remain astonished that anybody who writes well leaves Word's grammar check on. C'mon, Prawn, trust your gut and turn that sucker off. You're a writer! (And we won't tell a soul if you turn it on to check your manuscript one time, just before you submit it. Deal?)

Maryn, who thinks it's probably not possible to program a good grammar checker
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
I remain astonished that anybody who writes well leaves Word's grammar check on. C'mon, Prawn, trust your gut and turn that sucker off. You're a writer! (And we won't tell a soul if you turn it on to check your manuscript one time, just before you submit it. Deal?)

Maryn, who thinks it's probably not possible to program a good grammar checker

Well, I do leave it turned on. I just don't trust it. But if a writer actually bothers to look at the rules the grammar check displays, it's possible to learn a great deal about grammar.
 

Prawn

Writing is finite,revising infinite
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 28, 2006
Messages
2,361
Reaction score
429
Location
Beast Coast
I remain astonished that anybody who writes well leaves Word's grammar check on. C'mon, Prawn, trust your gut and turn that sucker off. You're a writer! (And we won't tell a soul if you turn it on to check your manuscript one time, just before you submit it. Deal?)

Maryn, who thinks it's probably not possible to program a good grammar checker

My novel is done. I didn't even spell check it until I finished the rough draft. It took me two and a half hours!

The grammar checker quit underlining after 30K words, and now that it is all spellchecked, the grammar checker has come back to life, and underlined the sentence I posted.
 

Tish Davidson

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,626
Reaction score
110
I remain astonished that anybody who writes well leaves Word's grammar check on. C'mon, Prawn, trust your gut and turn that sucker off. You're a writer! (And we won't tell a soul if you turn it on to check your manuscript one time, just before you submit it. Deal?)

Maryn, who thinks it's probably not possible to program a good grammar checker


I leave it on, but I use my brain, too. It is especially helpful if you set the optional settings to flag sentences in passive voice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.