Having hung around this fantastic site for about six months now, I am wondering who we are primarily writng for. Is it:
a) Ourselves
In which case, do the opinions, speling errors, grammatical corrections!, etc. pointed out in SYW really matter.
b)Editors and publishers
If this is the case, does it have an impact on the depth of the writing.
c)Readers
Do we overestimate or underestimate the ability of readers to know a good story. What is more important to them, a grammatically perfect piece of work, or a damn good story. Dan Brown, sorry, comes to mind here. Are some of the things picked up on SYW really within the normal awareness of the average reader or, is this something that is more important to the editors and publishers?
I think that what motivates my writing is, initially, just a need to get it out of my head. It's like picking a scab, or peeling off sunburnt skin. Niggling, annoying, jabbing and poking me, pleasure and pain entwined. A final sigh of relief, feeling lighter, cleaner, one step closer to the centre of myself.
I'd be lying if the reaction of others to my writing was irrelevant, and also that to one day see something of mine in Waterstones was not the overarching goal, and that to do that editors and publishers need to be appeased.
I'd like to thinky my motivation is a balance of all the above, but I know that most of the time, it isn't.
So, what is the breakdown of your motivation and what happens, however, when that balance wavers and you seek the approval of just one, be it reader, editor/publisher, or self?
a) Ourselves
In which case, do the opinions, speling errors, grammatical corrections!, etc. pointed out in SYW really matter.
b)Editors and publishers
If this is the case, does it have an impact on the depth of the writing.
c)Readers
Do we overestimate or underestimate the ability of readers to know a good story. What is more important to them, a grammatically perfect piece of work, or a damn good story. Dan Brown, sorry, comes to mind here. Are some of the things picked up on SYW really within the normal awareness of the average reader or, is this something that is more important to the editors and publishers?
I think that what motivates my writing is, initially, just a need to get it out of my head. It's like picking a scab, or peeling off sunburnt skin. Niggling, annoying, jabbing and poking me, pleasure and pain entwined. A final sigh of relief, feeling lighter, cleaner, one step closer to the centre of myself.
I'd be lying if the reaction of others to my writing was irrelevant, and also that to one day see something of mine in Waterstones was not the overarching goal, and that to do that editors and publishers need to be appeased.
I'd like to thinky my motivation is a balance of all the above, but I know that most of the time, it isn't.
So, what is the breakdown of your motivation and what happens, however, when that balance wavers and you seek the approval of just one, be it reader, editor/publisher, or self?