- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
- Messages
- 2,926
- Reaction score
- 3,046
- Location
- MD
- Website
- gorokandwulf.blogspot.com
OK, I know I'm late to the party (I didn't find out about this until the DearAuthor post), but I've just read a blog entry by fantasy author Brandon Sandersen suggesting that readers buy hardbacks instead of paperbacks to better support authors. He does make a good point about how you can buy the hardback on Amazon for less and yet the author and publisher will still get the same. But it still comes across as trying to "guilt" readers into buying the hardback. Y'know, I wish I could buy all the new hardbacks I come across that seem cool. But they cost a lot, even with discount coupons, etc. They're also harder to trade in later, heavier, harder to store, etc.
I don't mind it when authors point out that they do better and make more money when I buy books a certain way. After all, I don't like it when a favorite author is forced to take a day job because that means they won't be writing as many books. But I don't like guilt trips, especially as these posts often resort to "preaching to the choir." Not to mention blaming readers for problems they can't control, such as distribution.
And while we're at it, please don't lecture me. Don't "guilt" me into never buying a book before the street date, into buying a book as soon after the street date as possible, into preordering your books from the bookstore (and not from Amazon) to ensure that more copies will be ordered, into buying only from independent bookstores and never from the Evil Chains, into never ever buying used or lending out a book or trading it into the used bookstore when I'm done or even giving it away
, and so on. I have bookshelves that have two and in one case three rows of books. And that doesn't count the boxes.
When haven't I supported authors?
On the other hand, when is it OK to beg readers? I've read posts from authors who asked readers to please buy their latest book new because the sales were low or whatever. Depending on the tone, I don't really mind -- I want to know if an author I like is not doing well. But I hate the essays that come across as lecturing. What is the dividing line? Or maybe the question should be "How come some authors come across as scolding schoolmarms, and others make you want to help them?"
I don't mind it when authors point out that they do better and make more money when I buy books a certain way. After all, I don't like it when a favorite author is forced to take a day job because that means they won't be writing as many books. But I don't like guilt trips, especially as these posts often resort to "preaching to the choir." Not to mention blaming readers for problems they can't control, such as distribution.
And while we're at it, please don't lecture me. Don't "guilt" me into never buying a book before the street date, into buying a book as soon after the street date as possible, into preordering your books from the bookstore (and not from Amazon) to ensure that more copies will be ordered, into buying only from independent bookstores and never from the Evil Chains, into never ever buying used or lending out a book or trading it into the used bookstore when I'm done or even giving it away
On the other hand, when is it OK to beg readers? I've read posts from authors who asked readers to please buy their latest book new because the sales were low or whatever. Depending on the tone, I don't really mind -- I want to know if an author I like is not doing well. But I hate the essays that come across as lecturing. What is the dividing line? Or maybe the question should be "How come some authors come across as scolding schoolmarms, and others make you want to help them?"