So I know fantasy readers in general don't have problems when they read about multiple gods, no gods, or alternative religions in high/epic/S&S fantasy. But I got an interesting comment from one of my betas, & it makes me wonder if setting it in the present & partially in the "real world" changes the way people will read it.
For example, the main characters in my last ms. are Angels of Death & there are multiple gods that they work under. They acknowledge the religions of our world because they work in it, and they have no problem with those religions, but there are a couple of specific explanations on how people came to believe what they believe when the truth (of this world) is different (like an explanation for Hercules & Jesus as real people from the past). The Jesus "explanation" got a "LOL" from one reader & a "won't this alienate people?" from another (& no comment from the other beta readers I don't know personally). But if the reader is already reading about a world where multiple gods exist, why would an explanation for Jesus according to that world's reality alienate them?
But this particular beta also seemed a little uncomfortable with the idea of multiple gods in general, or at least worried that agents/readers would be, so I wondered if it really was the setting that made a difference. Does bringing in the "real world" change the way people see fantasy mythology? Do fantasy readers see it as okay to have multiple gods, a different type of God, or no higher being at all when the fantasy is set long ago in a faraway place, & then feel threatened when the setting is close to home?
I realize there are some people who would shun the work, regardless, if it presented a religion that didn't match their own. But I never expected them to be part of my audience anyway. It was really those who usually read fantasy & are exposed to different cultures with different religions who I would be surprised to hear had problems with it. The actual multiple god part in my own novel is not going to change (too important a part of the novel), but I thought the question the reader raised was interesting & thought I'd see what you all think.
For example, the main characters in my last ms. are Angels of Death & there are multiple gods that they work under. They acknowledge the religions of our world because they work in it, and they have no problem with those religions, but there are a couple of specific explanations on how people came to believe what they believe when the truth (of this world) is different (like an explanation for Hercules & Jesus as real people from the past). The Jesus "explanation" got a "LOL" from one reader & a "won't this alienate people?" from another (& no comment from the other beta readers I don't know personally). But if the reader is already reading about a world where multiple gods exist, why would an explanation for Jesus according to that world's reality alienate them?
But this particular beta also seemed a little uncomfortable with the idea of multiple gods in general, or at least worried that agents/readers would be, so I wondered if it really was the setting that made a difference. Does bringing in the "real world" change the way people see fantasy mythology? Do fantasy readers see it as okay to have multiple gods, a different type of God, or no higher being at all when the fantasy is set long ago in a faraway place, & then feel threatened when the setting is close to home?
I realize there are some people who would shun the work, regardless, if it presented a religion that didn't match their own. But I never expected them to be part of my audience anyway. It was really those who usually read fantasy & are exposed to different cultures with different religions who I would be surprised to hear had problems with it. The actual multiple god part in my own novel is not going to change (too important a part of the novel), but I thought the question the reader raised was interesting & thought I'd see what you all think.
) and keep reading. If there were other hot-button issues in the same story it might be enough for me to put the book down.