HELP-- Ordering my Romantic Paranormal Series

Status
Not open for further replies.

MMcC

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 19, 2006
Messages
311
Reaction score
59
Location
New England
Website
maureenmccarrie.blogspot.com
I posted this on another board, but really would love feedback here, too. This is making me a tad nuts.

I'm well into outlining, and writing, my three (and possibly more, but for now three) part series of Hawthorne's Knot novels. They are contemporary paranormal with a strong dose of humor and nuances of parody. My question is this:

Since the vampire thing is getting pooped on by just about everyone (but we all know it will live forever) I am wondering if I should NOT target the vamp leg of this trilogy as the kickoff. It's the strongest at this point, but I may be able to sell it as part of a trilogy if I lead with another of the set. The three heroes are a vamp, a shapeshifter (NOT a were, but similar), and a Gregori (fallen angel) who wants to be restored as an angel.

Here is a slapped-together glance at the trilogy. Tell me if you think I should lead with one of the others... I'm really sweating this. My fear is if I kick off with the strongest so far (Armando, my vampire) I will kill any chances the other two have.

HAWTHORNE'S KNOT

1. Magic in the Blood -- Armando and Maggie's story
Armando is a vampire, Maggie a photographer. He is the head of a secret society bound to protect something VERY important, but also to defend innocence and battle evil. The plot involves Maggie being drawn by unseen forces toward a bar in Cambridge, MA where a strange clientele gathers. It is in the basement of an old stone church-- the church itself is now Armando's office and the command center for his organization. Think an urban version of the StarWars bar scene with shapeshifters, vamps, leprechauns, and other paranormal flotsam and jetsam... plus they have Gregorian Karaoke every Friday!

2. Magic of the Moon --Daniel and Annie's story
Dan arrives in a small harbor town on a mission. Some very unique and possibly sacred artifacts have surfaced, and a good man has been murdered. A member of a secret society of protectors and sacred-trust-keepers, he needs a cover to blend in. Unfortunately the only position open temporarily is that of priest-- visiting priest. He parks his Harley in the barn, shucks off his faded jeans and t-shirt, and dons the basic black of a man of God. But he's also a shapeshifter, and a killer when he needs to be. Plus he's lusting after Annie, the choir director, who may be much, much more than she seems.

3. Magic in His Hands --Gideon and Tessa's story
Tessa was a beautiful, broken woman until Gideon's healing hands performed a miracle, and restored her body and mind. But her soul is still in tatters, and she can't help wondering how this gorgeous, elusive man repaired what everyone swore was shattered forever. She tracks him down in a strange, quirky bar (of all places!) and tries to uncover his secret. But Gideon's secret isn't his ability as a healer-- it's a much older, darker tale. He works for a mysterious group of extraordinary men and women. But who is he, truly? And from where does his astonishing power come? Gideon can't risk revealing his darkest self to this wonderful woman. Tess can't imagine living without Gideon and longs to chase the shadows from his eyes. But will her tenderness destroy him?

I value AW members' opinions. What do you guys think? If it matters, Armando's story is about 1/3 done, Dan's is maybe 1/4, and Gideon's is just an outline.
 

katiemac

Five by Five
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
11,521
Reaction score
1,667
Location
Yesterday
A few thoughts, take 'em or leave 'em.

Essentially you're writing three separate, stand alone novels, despite you're linking them by a series. Correct? Is there a common thread in them, despite the paranormal romance angle, that requires these books be "a series"?

From where I stand, it sounds like it's not so much a Harry Potter case where if the first book doesn't do well, the second book won't happen. You've got new characters, plots, storylines -- sounds like completely different books. Worst case scenario, you've got two new books you can put out under a pseudonym if the first one does so badly you can't show your face in publishing again. (Let's hope that's not the case!)

Write what you want to write. Of course, the simplest solution: If the vampire angle is innovate and creative, you'll be just fine.
 

BiggerBoat

Just Shovelin' Chum
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
177
Reaction score
25
Location
Amity
As they say, write and sell the 1st one and then worry about the rest.

In terms of picking which one to complete first, I'd say just consider the one your most passionate about, the one with the characters and themes that you are most invested in.

As an aside (to ignore in favor of your own preference), I felt like #2 was a solid hook.
 

MMcC

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 19, 2006
Messages
311
Reaction score
59
Location
New England
Website
maureenmccarrie.blogspot.com
They are all very tied. Each will read on its own but the characters will be "visiting" one another, and the three male leads know one another well and work together.

In truth? I would like to write fifteen of these books, set around the hub of this bar/secret society. But I'm certain these three are doable within 2 years.

Right now romance agents/editors are slushpiling vamps. My initial impulse was "yeah, but mine is a bit of a parady, so..." Now I'm wondering if I should lead with a different angle. I'm going to be pitching it AS a trilogy.

Grrr. Wish I'd thought of this before beginning.
 

PeeDee

Where's my tea, please...?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
11,724
Reaction score
2,085
Website
peterdamien.com
YOu may like to write fifteen, but you have to consider that you may only wind up writing one. So make sure your one is the most smash-bangiest thing you can, like James said. And then, if things go well and you get a chance to do a second in the series, make THAT your most smash-bangiest possible.

Giving this novel less to set up for future novels is a good way to ensure there isn't a future novel.
 

Gillhoughly

Grumpy writer and editor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
5,363
Reaction score
1,763
Location
Getting blitzed at Gillhoughly's Reef, Haleakaloha
A bit off topic, but Anne Rice has a rather famous vamp in her books, named "Armand."

Unless Armando's name is meant to be an intentional homage to her, you might want to consider changing it.

If you can't stand her stuff, having his name in your book is going to get painful. Some readers will assume you named him after her character, are yourself a huge fan of her books, and will only be too happy to talk about them instead of your own.

Just a thought.
.
 

MMcC

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 19, 2006
Messages
311
Reaction score
59
Location
New England
Website
maureenmccarrie.blogspot.com
Love Anne Rice and the name choice was deliberate, though the novel has absolutely NO resemblence to her work. BTW I LOVE Donovan's Reef!

I won't live long enough to write 15. I would love to. I will PROBABLY live long enough to finish these three. Woohootie. :) I'm actually incredibly into this process since it started.

I do appreciate the comments. Not really worried about the content of the novels or even the novels themselves. As of last week I was getting slight buzzby, and I feel good about THAT. My big fear is somebody saying "we will take THESE TWO but NOT THAT" or "no vamps, thanks." Romance has been saturated with vampire novels, and I do sympathize.

I wish Armando had decided to be something else, but he walked in fully formed and is stubborn as hell. Bloodsucking twerp!
 

Soccer Mom

Crypto-fascist
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
18,604
Reaction score
8,039
Location
Under your couch
Write whichever story you feel the strongest about. If it sells and does well, you can pitch the next one as a story set in the same world, or linked in whatever way. If it doesn't do that well or doesn't sell, just pitch the next book as a stand alone.
 

BiggerBoat

Just Shovelin' Chum
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
177
Reaction score
25
Location
Amity
veinglory said:
Vampires are still selling like hotcakes in this genre and will for some time to come--lead with the vamp.

Yeah, I haven't heard about a big backlash in the vampire/werewolf stuff yet (but I'm not particullary plugged-in either). I do feel like the bottom is going to fall out one of these days, but there will probably always be opportuntities for well-written cross-genre. Paranormal romance and urban fantasy is pretty hot right now. It seems like every other book cover these days has some smokin' chick in a black latex dress, back to the camera, clutching her stake/crucifix/magical charm/werewolf lover.
 

johnzakour

Dangerous with a Keyboard
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2006
Messages
1,939
Reaction score
263
Website
www.johnzakour.com
PeeDee said:
YOu may like to write fifteen, but you have to consider that you may only wind up writing one. So make sure your one is the most smash-bangiest thing you can, like James said. And then, if things go well and you get a chance to do a second in the series, make THAT your most smash-bangiest possible.

Giving this novel less to set up for future novels is a good way to ensure there isn't a future novel.

Yep, concentrate on the first one, worry about others after the first well sells as without that you don't have the others.

Wow, I agree with Pete. (Dang, this is the second time in two days that's happened. I think this may be a sign of the coming Armageddon....)
 

rugcat

Lost in the Fog
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
16,339
Reaction score
4,111
Location
East O' The Sun & West O' The Moon
Website
www.jlevitt.com
johnzakour said:
Wow, I agree with Pete. (Dang, this is the second time in two days that's happened. I think this may be a sign of the coming Armageddon....)
No, that's a good thing. When you two differ, then by default I have to agree with at least one of you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.