I've been writing fiction for about a year and a half. The fist six months were golden -- I was writing almost every day, working on a novel. I knew it was just a practise novel and would never get published, but I was having fun and I spent quite a lot of time working out the plot and the characters and building a world. In other words, I felt it had enough merit to kep me moving. I was about a third of the way through it by last January (at about 100 pages).
Then I started reading the odd author's website and checkd out a few writing forums (not these ones) and decided to follow the seemingly practical advice to start writing short stories because it's the best way to break into publishing.
The trouble is, I don't think I'm very good at writing short stories. For some reason I can't seem to get a handle on them -- I have lots of ideas and I spend ages working out plotlines and characters, but for some reason the wordcount limitations seem to cramp my style. I think that's because I love to get into my character's heads a lot, and in short fiction that's not really possible. I've managed to finish a small number of shorts, and one in particular is reasonably good, I think, but my writing has become very slow and sporadic and I am not writing with the eagerness I felt when I was working on the novel. I just can't seem to distill a story into a readable short, I have a lot of unfinished stories, and I'm getting frustrated with myself.
Does it make sense to spend a year writing a novel, or would it be better to keep on trying to master short stories? And -- are there publlished writers who write good novels but can't write shorts? Does anyone here feel that they are more suited to novel writing than short story writing? I guess what I'm asking is whether my inability to pump out short stories is an indication that I can't write any story of any length, period. I think I have some small talent, but perhaps I don't have the skill.
Then I started reading the odd author's website and checkd out a few writing forums (not these ones) and decided to follow the seemingly practical advice to start writing short stories because it's the best way to break into publishing.
The trouble is, I don't think I'm very good at writing short stories. For some reason I can't seem to get a handle on them -- I have lots of ideas and I spend ages working out plotlines and characters, but for some reason the wordcount limitations seem to cramp my style. I think that's because I love to get into my character's heads a lot, and in short fiction that's not really possible. I've managed to finish a small number of shorts, and one in particular is reasonably good, I think, but my writing has become very slow and sporadic and I am not writing with the eagerness I felt when I was working on the novel. I just can't seem to distill a story into a readable short, I have a lot of unfinished stories, and I'm getting frustrated with myself.
Does it make sense to spend a year writing a novel, or would it be better to keep on trying to master short stories? And -- are there publlished writers who write good novels but can't write shorts? Does anyone here feel that they are more suited to novel writing than short story writing? I guess what I'm asking is whether my inability to pump out short stories is an indication that I can't write any story of any length, period. I think I have some small talent, but perhaps I don't have the skill.