- Joined
- Jan 8, 2006
- Messages
- 44
- Reaction score
- 2
Mainly in Fantasy novels, what exactly is so wrong about using simple words to name things?
For instance, in my fantasy book I have a set of people named 'Recorders', which is basically what they do, record things and give assignments. When I explained this to a friend of mine, she highly disagreen and said 'Scribes' sounds better.
To me, I disagree. Scribes just sounds so....used...I don't know. And I know 'Recorder' is so blunt and un-creative, but it honestly just sounds right to me!
For instance, in K.A Applegate's series, she commonly uses the term 'thought-speak' for telekinese, how her characters communicate. It's very simple and 'uncreative' in terms, but it works well and whenever I read it, I think of it as an actual word with a meaning, not a lame uncreative way to say telekinese.
I understands the concept of 'It's your book; do what you want.' but ignoring that rule, honestly, is there anything wrong with using simple words and terms to name a noun? Does it really sound THAT 'bad-writer' like?
For instance, in my fantasy book I have a set of people named 'Recorders', which is basically what they do, record things and give assignments. When I explained this to a friend of mine, she highly disagreen and said 'Scribes' sounds better.
To me, I disagree. Scribes just sounds so....used...I don't know. And I know 'Recorder' is so blunt and un-creative, but it honestly just sounds right to me!
For instance, in K.A Applegate's series, she commonly uses the term 'thought-speak' for telekinese, how her characters communicate. It's very simple and 'uncreative' in terms, but it works well and whenever I read it, I think of it as an actual word with a meaning, not a lame uncreative way to say telekinese.
I understands the concept of 'It's your book; do what you want.' but ignoring that rule, honestly, is there anything wrong with using simple words and terms to name a noun? Does it really sound THAT 'bad-writer' like?