I'm reading his Conan stories and I'm wondering how his Solomon Kane stories are. I've heard Solomon is a more original character.
zornhau said:They're good. A long time since I read them. I don't think there are that many, but there's at least one poem as well. Kane has a certain grim moral force, in contrast to Conan's more limited moral compass.
However, in the context of his times, Conan is a very original character. Howard created the barbarian sub genre. Saying Conan isn't original is like saying Tolkein's elves are a cliche.
From what I understand (waiting for the Kull stories to be reprintedbluejester12 said:Well, I haven't read Kull or Brak, but I heard all three (including Conan) are fairly similar so that's where I was goin with that. I don't know.
bluejester12 said:I'm reading his Conan stories and I'm wondering how his Solomon Kane stories are. I've heard Solomon is a more original character.
JDCrayne said:...
Bran? ...
bluejester12 said:Well, I haven't read Kull or Brak, but I heard all three (including Conan) are fairly similar so that's where I was goin with that. I don't know.
zornhau said:What happened - IIRC - was a certain editor in the 80s churned his way through the Conan tales, tweaking them enough to establish ownership. Then he fleshed out some of the REH's rejects and created pastiches.
Finally, he re-purposed stories of other REH characters to make them Conan, on the grounds that the characters were all the same.
This, however, to be as charitable as possible and to avoid swearing, is pish. They resemble each other only in that they are warriors taking part in gritty action adventure stories.
zornhau said:Yes. He also dicked around (I'm being charitable here) with the text of the originals. See http://www.barbariankeep.com/issues.html
Yes the mutilated stuff is fun. But so is your local Beatles tribute band. Neither is a substitute for the original.
Shadow_Ferret said:Not a substitute, no, but at the time it was the only way to get your Conan, unless you could find old out-of-print collections. And at the time, many of us didn't realize it was diluted and reformulated.
And as writers unto themselves, I enjoyed both L. Sprague de Camp's and Lin Carter's stuff.
Also, don't some REH fans blame De Camp for creating an inaccurate image of Howard's life? I don't know how true this is, but I've read articles alleging all sorts of stuff.zornhau said:Yes. He also dicked around (I'm being charitable here) with the text of the originals. See http://www.barbariankeep.com/issues.html
Do I qualify as a villain in an REH story now?