Pearls from Lit Agent X

Status
Not open for further replies.

triceretops

Banned
Flounced
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
14,060
Reaction score
2,755
Location
In a van down by the river
Website
guerrillawarfareforwriters.blogspot.com
The following is some of the reason why Ms. Vater rejects manuscripts, because of weak or sub-standard writing:

A: A book has to have strong plotting and intriguing story elements to work. It also has to be well written. I can tell pretty quickly whether the book is written well, and by that I mean it's up to publication standards. This doesn't mean I'm tossing it out if I find a typo or two. There are a lot of things that let me know the writing is not ready:

Overstatement / repetition -- The writer hits me over the head with what's already obvious by what he's already indicated in a previous sentence.

Writing doesn't flow well -- The sentences just snag my eye because the phrasing isn't smooth. Awkward phrasing. Run-on sentences.

Not quite the right way with words -- frequent misuse of words, just not selecting the right word for the intended meaning.

Character development doesn't work -- Characters are written too simply.

Dialog doesn't feel natural.

Dialog tags are intrusive.

Scenes have no tone. Or the writer tries too hard to make it feel creepy and instead it feels like a cheezy B movie.

Scenes overall don't work.

Too much telling, not enough showing.

Pacing drags. Nothing pushing the plot forward: no intrigue, no conflict, no questions raised, no goal for protagonist.

Writer tries too hard to show off his vocabulary but just ends up getting in his own way with pretentious language rather than just telling the story.


Well, I definitely see myself in the repetition/overstatement catagory. It seems like the last two sentences of every one of my long-winded paragraphs are repeating the same message as though I'm hammering the reader over the head for emphasis. I have since gone in there to look for those pesky double hammer smacks.

Hmmm...writer tries to hard for the creepy or satire. Guilty, that's me in spades. Even my fight scenes are waaaaay over-the-top. Too much blow by blow.

Can you find youself in there somewhere? Ever have the comment "the writing wasn't strong enough?" You'll probably find it in the above list, not to say that there are certainly a few other reasons. But I thought it valid and noteworthy coming from an agent.

Tri
 
Last edited:

Provrb1810meggy

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
2,896
Reaction score
475
Yep, overstatement is definitely something I'm guilty of. Will have to go through and catch that in the revisions. Unfortunately, I'll be making the novel shorter, when it so desperately needs to be longer. I also do too much telling. Overstatement and telling seem to go hand in hand.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,159
Location
The right earlobe of North America
Interesting thread. Maybe we ought to do some self-critiquing here, you know, the way the Chinese used to make people do during the Cultural Revolution. Post a snippet, say no more than 500 words, and point out flaws. If anybody else is interested, I'll contribute.

caw.
 

Higgins

Banned
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
4,302
Reaction score
414
Weak objections to weak writing

triceretops said:
Too much telling, not enough showing.

I can see the rest as being problems, but this "too much telling" seems very lame. Especially since it automatically suggests the opposite "not enough showing"....

What's up with that? Call the crate of writing police.
 

aadams73

A Work in Progress
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
9,901
Reaction score
6,428
Location
Oregon
blacbird said:
Interesting thread. Maybe we ought to do some self-critiquing here, you know, the way the Chinese used to make people do during the Cultural Revolution. Post a snippet, say no more than 500 words, and point out flaws. If anybody else is interested, I'll contribute.

caw.

Might be a good thing to do over at SYW.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.