Images in a book that is NOT illustrated

TsukiRyoko

Forced into cell phone life
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
2,692
Reaction score
942
Location
West Vir-freaking-ginia
Website
tsuki-explodes.blogspot.com
I've seen quite a few novels and such with an image or two in them, even though the book is not illustrated (i.e. The Lord of the Rings). If you wanted an image in your book, how would you signify this in the manuscript? Would you use brackets, or italics, what?
 

Jaws

Apex Predator
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
582
Reaction score
224
Location
Loitering just offshore on the Silicon Prairie
Website
scrivenerserror.blogspot.com
You don't. That's something for discussion among the author, editor, and book designer when things get to that stage. If you want to keep notes for yourself, that's great; but don't burden the editor with that when the editor is looking for a reason not to say "no!"

The one exception is when a particular graphic is necessary to illustrate or summarize data in an otherwise unillustrated nonfiction work. There are at least a dozen ways of indicating that; the most transparent is to add a line between paragraphs, immediately after the first paragraph that mentions that data, something like this:
\\QQ insert figure 1.1 about here XQQ\\​
(that's the in-house convention for comments used at several nonfiction publishers) and include figure 1.1 as the last page of that chapter, or after the entire book if there are only one or two graphics for the whole book.

The last thing that you, as an author, want to do is appear to start imposing design choices for a "non-illustrated" book. Rightly or wrongly, many editors and book designers take this as a sign that the author is too arrogant to work with.