- Joined
- Oct 16, 2005
- Messages
- 6,260
- Reaction score
- 1,358
- Location
- Scotland
- Website
- www.fictionpress.com

brainstorm77 said:I just think about some woman falling into the arms of the hero LOL
Sonarbabe said:We're now in a day and age where it's acceptable to call it what it is without being considered vulgar.
Tracy said:Where you just KNOW that she's going to end up with the nice guy who's just her friend, rather than the sexy (but not-so-nice) man she starts off with.
kuroisama said:That's MHO, but seriously, can we come up with a better phrase than "engorged manhood", it sounds like the heroine should get the hero to a doctor instead of showing him some loving.
.
Susan Gable said:ROTFLOL- Like Viagra gone bad. "If your manhood is engorged for more than three hours, see a doctor right away."
LOL!
Susan G.

I invested in cloth book covers for that very reason. That way I could read my romances without the idiot committee making comments (this was back in high school). Nowadays I don't care who knows what I'm reading.PattiTheWicked said:A ripped bodice on the cover. That's a deal-breaker for me.
I totally agree. I like the women with a healthy, responsible sexual history. She had a boyfriend or two (or five) in her past and each of those relationships was physical. Nothing wrong with that. Sex is better when both parties know what their about.sanders555 said:I also hate the cliches where the girl has to be either a virgin or slut.
I think that's a cliche of life, not romance. Women are supposed to be chaste and pure (read - frigid), while men are supposed to go out and get some so they can be great in bed when they deflower their virginal wife on their wedding night.sanders555 said:Like it's okay even better if the guy is a known womanizer but the woman has to be frigid to every other man in the world.
kuroisama said:AH!! I just remembered a cliche!!! The mistaken virgins (I'm guilty of this one in one of my mss, but it's for a good reason so don't judge me). The hero is completely convinced that the heroine is a slut (or just not a virgin); and he won't believe otherwise no matter how many times the heroine tries to convince him. When they finally do it (consentual or forced), he either is mad at the heroine because she didn't MAKE him believe her (what were all our arguments about you, you numbskull?) or he feels guilty and decides to avoid her as penance for his mistake. Which, in turn, makes the heroine get all weepy and think she's bad in bed and the hero doesn't like her anymore.
Sonarbabe said:Not that long ago, I read a Harlequin Presents Uncut that had that kind of cliche! All in all it was a good book, but there were about 20 times throughout the story where I just wanted to whoop the crap out of both the hero and the heroine. Would it be in poor taste to just bash their heads together?
kuroisama said:But, look at it this way. If you're that mad, then the author achieved her goal: You care about the characters and what's going on with their lives.And, you want to cause one or both of them serious bodily harm because their both idiots.
Oh, I laughed so hard I had tears in my eyes, and my husband's laying on the couch shaking his head at me. I haven't read this in the past couple of days, but I had told him about the "engorged manhood" complaint when it was first posted, so he understood the meaning behind the pic. I actually almost fell off my chair from laughing so hard!!Gillhoughly said:Some engorged manhood.
Enjoy!
![]()