Interesting proposition...
sunandshadow said:
Say you had a yearly competition where the best 5 or so teams were given the prize of a spaceship or a territory to rule - can you think of any idea why this might happen?
Just based on your own parameters, the field narrows.
First of all, it's a "yearly competition."
First parameter: there has to be a good deal of either land or spaceships to be given away. I suppose you could limit it by saying it's the "First Annual So-and-so Competition" but even then, how many "whatevers" will the sponsors eventually give away?
sunandshadow said:
Why would the people running the competition have spaceships or territories to give away, a limited number each year, and people couldn't get them enywhere else? Why not just sell them to the highest bidder if they're rare and valuable?
Chances are, in a world without absolutes, there probably is land/spaceships that can be bought by high bidders (or just those with enough capital to fund the expeditions), but your sponsors want to see some egalitarian balance and want to offer up opportunities to folk that might not otherwise have the chance.
It reminds me a little of how royalty gave land grants in the new world. Your idea throws on the competitive spin to see how it's parceled out.
Second parameter: Since this territory is basically for homesteading (you haven't mentioned anything about having quell native revolutions), it's probably a modest size – perhaps big enough to support a town and surrounding farmlands.
If you took the spaceship route, I could easily see a crazy rich industrialist commissioning a series of ten (or however many) self-supporting space stations – complete with their own tug to be dragged to whatever orbit they can get clearance for. That year's winner has a chance to set up their own invite-only culture as part of a social experiment.