- Joined
- Aug 8, 2006
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 0
First, I'm happy I found this place. As someone just now getting ready to write the first scene of his screenplay, I think I might learn alot here.
On to the question:
I recently read an article (albeit undated) that says most formatting should now be removed from submitted screenplays.
Things such as; CUT TO:, ANGLES, WIDE SHOT, and even MORE and CONTINUED aren't used anymore. The thinking being is these things are the director's choice, and I have to say I agree with it.
If I was a director or actor, I wouldn't want the script so laid out in front of me like that; seems that would stunt my creativity just a bit. I think it also makes the screenplay much easier to read.
Is this something members here agree with?
If so, what if the writer wants something in particular? For instance;
<SLUG LINE>
ABOVE ANGLE: a 1950's Rolls Royce is driving on a road flanked by thick woods.
becomes:
The camera looks down on a 1950's Rolls Royce driving on a road flanked by thick woods.
Would that be acceptable?
Thanks!
Jonesy
On to the question:
I recently read an article (albeit undated) that says most formatting should now be removed from submitted screenplays.
Things such as; CUT TO:, ANGLES, WIDE SHOT, and even MORE and CONTINUED aren't used anymore. The thinking being is these things are the director's choice, and I have to say I agree with it.
If I was a director or actor, I wouldn't want the script so laid out in front of me like that; seems that would stunt my creativity just a bit. I think it also makes the screenplay much easier to read.
Is this something members here agree with?
If so, what if the writer wants something in particular? For instance;
<SLUG LINE>
ABOVE ANGLE: a 1950's Rolls Royce is driving on a road flanked by thick woods.
becomes:
The camera looks down on a 1950's Rolls Royce driving on a road flanked by thick woods.
Would that be acceptable?
Thanks!
Jonesy