A little advice please . . .

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lifelongdagger

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
515
Reaction score
41
Location
Romford, London, Uk
I am writing my first novel and am contemplating having one main character with several subsidiary ones. My question is regarding that most perennial of issues - Point of View.

I am thinking about structuring the story so that the first time a character is introduced, the whole of that particular chapter is from his/her point of view, even if they are interacting with the main character.

Other than this, the story would be exclusively from the main character's point of view.

Does anyone think this is workable or will I be heading for problems with this sort of outline?
 

Bayou Bill

AW Ne'er-Do-Well
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
958
Reaction score
693
Location
Down so low in Austin, bottom looks like up.
Website
billsbilge.blogspot.com
Lifelongdagger said:
I am writing my first novel and am contemplating having one main character with several subsidiary ones. My question is regarding that most perennial of issues - Point of View.

I am thinking about structuring the story so that the first time a character is introduced, the whole of that particular chapter is from his/her point of view, even if they are interacting with the main character.

Other than this, the story would be exclusively from the main character's point of view.

Does anyone think this is workable or will I be heading for problems with this sort of outline?
Sounds okay, to me. In my first novel, I used the POV of the two main characters. With my second novel, I had a single MC plus two other major characters and used them all for POV. That said, none of my novels is published.

The only thing I did differently from what you're planning is I'd sometimes use more than one POV in a chapter (mine ran about 3000-5000 words). I'd use a shift/switch marker to signal when the shift occured.

Good luck.

Bayou Bill :cool:
 

Kristal

Registered
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
38
Reaction score
3
I personally don't think I would do it that way. First of all, introducing a new character adds some intrigue...what is this person like, are they friend or foe. If you go into their heads right away, it gives away all of the secrets. Secondly, it is easier to give a bit of physical description from someone else's point of view, rather than from the person you are trying to describe.

Like I said...just my opinion though, and I am humbly only a new author myself.


--Kristal
 

spacejock2

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
500
Reaction score
107
Location
W Australia
Website
www.spacejock.com.au
I usually write the scene from the viewpoint of the character most affected by (or in) it. Otherwise you have to experience their emotions through an onlooker or through dialog, which isn't as powerful.
It also depends how minor the character is, and whether they appear again in the book. You can mislead your readers if you introduce a character, give them a scene, share their thoughts and then drop them.
 

Lifelongdagger

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
515
Reaction score
41
Location
Romford, London, Uk
Mmm . . . I know what you're saying about the physical description, Kristal. The novel is a mystery thriller, so I was thinking that by going straight into the heads of the characters without physical description or introduction would add to their mystery. Secrets wouldn't be divulged as thoughts and perceptions would be ambigious enough not illicit relationship and motive yet not too vague as to appear purposefully shallow or evasive.

I think, Kristal, that I may be setting myself an enormous challenge here, but I think I'll give it a go.

Best of luck with your own writing, and try and drop the 'only a new author' tag. It reminds me of when I used to say to myself that I am 'only writing a story'. When the kids have stopped screaming at eachother, I now sit down to 'write my book'. It feels so much more affirming.

Kind regards,

Lifelong
 

Lifelongdagger

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
515
Reaction score
41
Location
Romford, London, Uk
Good points, spacejock. There are only five or six characters in the book, all interlinked in a way that the reader only discovers at the end.

What you say about the viewpoint of one most affected is exactly how I was planning to go about laying the story out, although you have crystallised it into words that have helped me to see that it is the right thing to do.

Thank you.

Kind regards,

Lifelong
 

nevada

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 27, 2006
Messages
2,590
Reaction score
697
Location
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Don't introduce a new POV if you're never going to use it again. Also if you're in someone's thoughts you cannot hold back what that person knows. It's cheating. And if there's one thing that I despise in mysteries, which may be why I dont read them much, it's cheating. The killer will think about the crime and if the reader is in his head then the reader will know about that.
 

JimmyB27

Hoopy frood
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 29, 2005
Messages
5,623
Reaction score
925
Age
44
Location
In the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable e
Website
destinydeceived.wordpress.com
nevada said:
Don't introduce a new POV if you're never going to use it again. Also if you're in someone's thoughts you cannot hold back what that person knows. It's cheating. And if there's one thing that I despise in mysteries, which may be why I dont read them much, it's cheating. The killer will think about the crime and if the reader is in his head then the reader will know about that.

But, he won't necessarily think over all the details of the crime. So, for example, he might just think about his secret coming out, rather than the fact that he slaughtered half a dozen people and fed them to his pigs.
To take a more mundane example, do you think to yourself, 'I have to go to Walmart, and buy some chicken, some potatoes...etc', or do you think 'I have to go food shopping later'?
 

nevada

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 27, 2006
Messages
2,590
Reaction score
697
Location
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
actually, yes i do think i have to go to safeway and buy chicken, potatoes, etc. (walmart doesnt sell fresh food here). Seriously. If I dont go over the list constantly, i'll forget everything on it. lol

The character might not think about all the details, although I think that's highly unlikely. I know from myself, that if i do something wrong at work, i think about it a lot and I would think that if you slaughtered half a dozen people and fed them to the pigs that you'd relive that all the time in order to capture the thrill you felt. Nevertheless, the character is going to be thinking about it in some way. So as reader, if i'm in the character's head, I'm going to know about it. That's how it works if you're writing tight POV and you're in somebody's head. What that person knows, the reader knows. That's the contract you agree to with that POV. And if you break that contract, be prepared to lose the reader.

Like I said, it's the thing I despise the most in mysteries. When the POV character knows something but the reader is kept in the dark. Some might say that's the fun of mysteries, but it's not fun. It's annoying. Maybe people accept that, but that doesnt mean it's good writing. Of course, if you can get away with it, go for it, but I think it's lazy writing. But that's just my opinion. lol take what you need, and discard the rest. Everything is just people's opinion really.
 

Lifelongdagger

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
515
Reaction score
41
Location
Romford, London, Uk
Thanks for your comments, Nevada.

One of the scenarios that I am thinking of is of a character pretending to be a policeman. He goes to the main character's house to question him about a burglary, with the ulterior motive of finding out where the character has been that afternoon.

I am writing the POV of the 'policeman' in such a way that his thoughts and perceptions lead the reader to realise that he is not a genuine policeman without revealing the entire story behind his motive. What is uppermost in his mind is not the backstory but the need to gain access to certain information. He has an agenda, but is only focused in this one scene on a small aspect of the greater whole.

In this case, I think he would be intent on keeping up the appearance of a policeman, worried that he may be found out, but completely focused on his task. None of which would be hidden from the reader. What would be hidden, to a degree, is the backstory of the motive.

I think that's fair, possibly . . .

Kind regards,

Lifelong
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,767
Reaction score
4,662
Location
Scotland
Re your original post, Lifelong, I also don't see anything wrong with what you're planning at all, but I agree with the posters who mentioned that you will need to be very careful if you intend using another POV where the reader learns that that other character definitely knew 'something' but it was deliberately withheld solely to prolong the reader's ignorance of whatever it was.

Mind you, someone may have pulled it off - I don't know.
 
Last edited:

TrainofThought

A flowering bud of bitchiness
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 7, 2006
Messages
6,179
Reaction score
6,835
Location
Land of Bier
Website
www.authordenisebaer.com
spacejock2 said:
It also depends how minor the character is, and whether they appear again in the book. You can mislead your readers if you introduce a character, give them a scene, share their thoughts and then drop them.
I agree with spacejock2, if it is a minor character with little significance. I am writing my first novel and it is mostly written with the two main character’s viewpoints, but I do have a minor character’s viewpoint significant to one main character.


Bayou Bill said:
I'd use a shift/switch marker to signal when the shift occured.
I would like to ask Bill about the shift/switch marker. I have read many books where I loved the change in font or in ALL CAPS to stress the character’s voice. But since I was told on another thread that this should not be done, I was curious as to how to do a shift/switch marker for POV. Do I need to come up with a design marker for POV? Thanks.
 

TrainofThought

A flowering bud of bitchiness
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 7, 2006
Messages
6,179
Reaction score
6,835
Location
Land of Bier
Website
www.authordenisebaer.com
Bufty said:
TrainofThought - Everything you always wanted to know about formatting!http://www.absolutewrite.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26126
Thank you. Do you know I read this entire thread and thought I retained it all? No idea how I missed the POV area. I saved it for future reference so I won’t continue to ask. There is much information for little brain activity. Thanks for pointing it out to me, AGAIN and apologize for the repetitive question.
 

Lifelongdagger

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
515
Reaction score
41
Location
Romford, London, Uk
Thank you to everyone for the input on this thread. You've all given me much to consider. I think I may now write the chapter in two versions, one from the main character POV and the other from the subsidiary character POV, and see which works best.

Kind regards,

Lifelong
 

Anonymisty

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
451
Reaction score
67
Location
The Shallow South
Website
www.mistymassey.com
kpmcneil22 said:
Lifelongdagger, if this is your rough draft/first draft, I would just go for it. You can always switch it around when you edit.

I agree - if you can write without constant self-editing (my own horrible vice) then do it, and edit later. It's much easier to fix what's already written.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.