Relativity question.

Status
Not open for further replies.

merper

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
248
Reaction score
18
Is there any physical law that prevents some invariant mass from being converted to it's corresponding relativistic energy(e=mc^2) and then being converted back to some other form of matter with the same mass? Assume it's an ideal process with negligible losses.

Don't know how you would go about doing this, just wondering if it is possible.
 

Ordinary_Guy

Industrial Strength
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
473
Reaction score
54
Location
Burbank, CA, USA
Website
www.facebook.com
merper said:
Is there any physical law that prevents some invariant mass from being converted to it's corresponding relativistic energy(e=mc^2) and then being converted back to some other form of matter with the same mass? Assume it's an ideal process with negligible losses.

Don't know how you would go about doing this, just wondering if it is possible.
As far as I know, no – there is no such theoretical limitation.

In practice, it gets stickier. Your "ideal process" would have to be fantastically complex: every conversion through known process releases some level of secondary particles unless you either 1.) have a novel method of controlling the basic 4 forces or 2.) can compensate for lost energy. Either way, it's likely that to preserve X amount of matter from energy conversion and back again that you'll be using an equal [huge] amount of energy in the preservation/reconstitution.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
Energy

Theoretically, no. Realistically, you'll probably have to add some amount of energy because reaching 100% efficiency is nearly impossible.
 

ChunkyC

It's hard being green
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
12,297
Reaction score
2,135
Location
trapped between my ears
Of course if you have a nice fat antimatter reactor to power your replicator so you can make a cup of Earl Grey tea out of the excess energy it throws off....
 
Last edited:

Soyarma

Registered
Joined
Jul 25, 2006
Messages
33
Reaction score
3
If I were a couple of thousand light years from a good cup of earl grey I'd be more than willing to mash some anti-hydrogen against some regular hydrogen for a cup of the brew.

Maybe that's the whole thing behind the replicators. Carting little bits of antimater around is cheaper on fuel consumption than all the earl grey the captain needs.
 

TheIT

Infuriatingly Theoretical
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
6,432
Reaction score
1,343
Location
Silicon Valley
A good, strong cup of tea powers your Infinite Improbability Drive, too.
 

merper

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
248
Reaction score
18
Cool, thanks.

In practice, it gets stickier. Your "ideal process" would have to be fantastically complex: every conversion through known process releases some level of secondary particles unless you either 1.) have a novel method of controlling the basic 4 forces or 2.) can compensate for lost energy. Either way, it's likely that to preserve X amount of matter from energy conversion and back again that you'll be using an equal [huge] amount of energy in the preservation/reconstitution.

This would be where the fiction part of science fiction comes in. >_-
 

Higgins

Banned
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
4,302
Reaction score
414
Just accellerate the mass

merper said:
Is there any physical law that prevents some invariant mass from being converted to it's corresponding relativistic energy(e=mc^2) and then being converted back to some other form of matter with the same mass? Assume it's an ideal process with negligible losses.

Don't know how you would go about doing this, just wondering if it is possible.

You can just accellerate the mass and come out with a lot more mass at the end than you had at the beginning. This happens all the time when relativistic "cosmic ray" (particles in this case) hit things. For example, a very fast proton could cause a "cascade" of much "heavier" (though not very stable) particles.
 

badducky

No Time For Chitchat, Kemosabe.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
3,951
Reaction score
850
Location
San Antonio, TX
Website
jmmcdermott.blogspot.com
Of course not. It's called "Magic".

Huge advantage of fantasy= "Hey, my research does not support my story needs." *nudges research aside* "That's too bad. Well, onto my rough draft..."

I love fantasy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.