Baywitch said:
Is there such a thing? I was under the immpression there was. Like good vs bad, up/down, slow/fast. I thought when you write there's a melody, a rhythm, sometimes it's quick and energetic and othertimes it's a waltz.
I received a rejection tonight for my partial, saying my beginning was very action packed and then..."disintegrated rapidly". And is this a fair conclusion to make after only 25 pages? The 26th is action city. How does one keep a novel constantly action packed?
Pacing does not mean keeping a novel action-packed. It sounds like you had too much action at the beginning, then dropped it completely. That would be poor pacing. Pacing is not like most songs. It's more like a roller coaster ride with constant ups and down. But the ups can't be too high, until you reach the climax, and the downs can't be too low, and neither can last too long. Pace is ebb and flow
There are several methods for pacing a novel, and the type of story usually determines how the novel should be paced, so it isn't anything close to easy to tell you how a novel should be paced. It depends on the novel.
But it does sound like you overpaced at the beginning, then underpaced shortly thereafter.
Good pace is incredibly important, and poor pace will make anyyone stop reading.
But how does one do it? The best answer I can give to this is to tell you to go grab a dozen bestselling novels in teh genre you're writing, and study the pace of each one carefully.
As for fair, yes, it's fair. Any agent or any editor will continue to read until you give them a reason to stop reading. If you give them a reason to stop on page one, they will not read page two. If you give them a reason to stop on page twenty-five, there's no reason on earth for them to read page twenty-six. If you never give them a reason to stop reading, they'll read right to the end, and still want more.