1 OR 2??

Status
Not open for further replies.

Anitraka

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 1, 2006
Messages
75
Reaction score
1
Location
Central California
Website
myspace.com
Which way is the easiest for the writers??
1: Write the whole story then go back and fix things that really need fixing
OR
2: Write and Fix as you go
 

Glenda

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 19, 2006
Messages
630
Reaction score
56
Write the whole story and then go back and fix, and fix and fix again.
 

Anitraka

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 1, 2006
Messages
75
Reaction score
1
Location
Central California
Website
myspace.com
Glenda said:
Write the whole story and then go back and fix, and fix and fix again.

First I was writing and fixing as I go. Then the story just kept falling into place and I didn't want to write and fix I wanted to finish the story and then go back and fix everything at once.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,159
Location
The right earlobe of North America
If, as I am writing, I think of something that needs attention from earlier in the manuscript, I'm better off if I fix it right then, or at least go back and make some notes as to what I need to do. Otherwise, I forget the exact problem, and only remember that there was a problem of uncertain nature, and that becomes a real hair-puller later.

caw.
 

Anitraka

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 1, 2006
Messages
75
Reaction score
1
Location
Central California
Website
myspace.com
blacbird said:
If, as I am writing, I think of something that needs attention from earlier in the manuscript, I'm better off if I fix it right then, or at least go back and make some notes as to what I need to do. Otherwise, I forget the exact problem, and only remember that there was a problem of uncertain nature, and that becomes a real hair-puller later.

caw.

I do that and/or I'll just wait to the end and re-read the story and know exactly what I have to fix.
 

aadams73

A Work in Progress
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
9,901
Reaction score
6,428
Location
Oregon
I do both where necessary, but the most important thing for me is to get the story down.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,159
Location
The right earlobe of North America
Anitraka said:
I do that and/or I'll just wait to the end and re-read the story and know exactly what I have to fix.

Obviously this is a "do what works for you" kind of question, so I'm not recommending anything. I just know that, for me, if I wait to go back and re-read at the end, it is a guaranteed thing that I will not remember what I wanted to do.

An associated point is that today's computer technology can really be your friend here. I often evolve (dare I use that term?) several parallel versions of a story or portions thereof as I work, saving them as separate files, with alternative passages or ideas for consideration during the editing process. That way I don't have to be immediately certain of a decision about something until later, when I've had more time to think about it and any alternatives. I've found that a pretty useful procedure.

caw.
 

Tish Davidson

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,626
Reaction score
110
Depends entirely on what works for you. One thing I do if I am writing and don't want to stop the flow is to make notes in brackets within the story of things that need fixing. Examples of things I might note: [Need to change timing of Sandy's illness]; [Too much tell, needs more dialogue or action]; [Need to know what kind of car had a rumble seat]. You get the idea. I find that it doesn't slow down the creative process but satisfies my need to fix things.
 

banjo

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
157
Reaction score
4
Location
Los Angeles
I do both. I try to write through, but sometimes a fix is so compleling that it needs to be done right away.

Another thing. Sometimes while writing I think of a twist I hadn't thought of before that works better than the one I already wrote. So I go back immediately and make the change and I move the original passage to the end of text in case I later decide to go back. Then I continue to write along the lines that flow from my new direction.

At the end I'll still need to go back and revise and rewrite anyway. Well that is what is working for me at this time.
 

Cat Scratch

The Peacock Next Door
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 22, 2006
Messages
672
Reaction score
140
Location
A Little To The Left
I'm definitely a write-then-fixer. I generally purge story all over the place and end up with a first draft that's a complete crapfest, but then later go back and fine-tune. As a result my first draft usually only takes a few weeks, but rewrites can take forever. But when I know where it's going, it's easier to look at the details. Does anyone but me ever worry that they'll die before a rewrite is complete? And that mess of a first draft will be the legacy you leave behind? I should add a disclaimer in the foot-notes: "I know this sentence really sucks it, but I intend to fix it later."
 

Simon Woodhouse

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
322
Reaction score
30
Location
New Zealand
Website
www.simonwoodhouse.com
I do both.

I'm in the middle of re-writing something at the moment, and I'm making quite big changes. The other day I had one of those panic-stricken episodes where I became convinced all I was doing was making the story worse, not better. I'd just re-written the same scene three times and I still wasn't happy with it. So I stopped and took a moment to think about what it was I wanted to say in the scene. What bit of information was it supposed to convey to the reader? After a bit of deliberation two things came to mind, so I had another go at a fourth re-write and it worked. If I'd just kept ploughing ahead without pausing to consider what I was doing, the whole thing would have got worse and worse.

Once this re-write is finished, I'm going to go back and read it, change anything that needs to be altered and then leave it for a while. I'll probably look at it again in a couple of months and do another re-write, but hopefully it won't be quite so drastic.

Out of the three novels I've written, I only consider one of them 'finished', and that's after two major re-writes and lots of editing.
 

AdamH

Pumped Up Kicks
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 17, 2005
Messages
1,123
Reaction score
115
Location
Canada's Ocean Playground
Anitraka said:
Which way is the easiest for the writers??
1: Write the whole story then go back and fix things that really need fixing
OR
2: Write and Fix as you go


I mostly do #1. The only time I do #2 is if I'm working on a short story but even then that's rare.
 

Danger Jane

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 11, 2005
Messages
7,921
Reaction score
5,006
Location
Rome
I try and fix as I go because huge messes intimidate me and then I'm liable to shove it in a drawer and never see it again. I'm better off writing with a little more care/OCD (however you look at it) even if that is a little slower.
 

Forbidden Snowflake

I'm quite put out.
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 16, 2006
Messages
2,026
Reaction score
340
Age
42
Location
UK
Website
www.vinjii.ch
I know I shouldn't fix and first write but I always go back and fix because it's calling me. And then I get bored with the story before it's done. And won't ever want to revise Chapter I again because I've already tried to fix it several times and I throw the Work into a corner. So, I'm trying not to look back and just write.
 

stace001

Look into my eyes
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 20, 2005
Messages
293
Reaction score
27
Location
Queensland, Australia
I'm definitely #1. I tried to write and fix as I went with my first novel and it almost didn't get finished.
 

TrickyFiction

Who?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 23, 2006
Messages
1,123
Reaction score
146
Location
on the precious Pacific.
I just cannot focus on editing as I go. If I do, I turn crazy perfectionist and end up losing track of the flow of the story. It's a tough decision for me to just ignore things and wait to fix them, but my first novel attempt (which ended in utter chaos) taught me that the "fix as you go" approach is completely wrong for me.
 

triceretops

Banned
Flounced
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
14,060
Reaction score
2,755
Location
In a van down by the river
Website
guerrillawarfareforwriters.blogspot.com
If I don't go back and take care of an arc or plot hole, it manifests itself, and then I have a pathogen on my hands that spreads to infect or misalign info in the future chapters. This doesn't happen too often, but it happens and I like to take care of it right then and there so I'm not stressed and thinking about it 200 pages later. Other than that, I fly right through to the end. On my second pass I usually reserve that for beefing up characterization.

tri
 

Vanessa

Writer and Music Producer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 31, 2005
Messages
1,282
Reaction score
168
Location
Inside my head most times!
I had to learn to write it all down first, which I like better. I used to fix as I go and it changed my whole thought process and plus it took much longer to finish. I'm so disciplined now.
biggrin.gif
 

Sharon Mock

Wing nut
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
455
Reaction score
82
Location
Interstitial
Website
kirizal.livejournal.com
I fall into the first camp. My motto is "Fix it in post" (sometimes muttered repeatedly under my breath as I write).

The exception is when something's so broken that I can't move forward, and I have no choice to go back and fix it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.