Anitraka said:How long does it take you to write a novel without taking a month break??
Anitraka said:How long does it take you to write a novel without taking a month break??
Sage said:I assume this was a question where she was curious as to our individual experiences, not a "correct" answer.
Shadow_Ferret said:We're suppposed to time ourselves?![]()
Mike Coombes said:Sure - or how else are you supposed to know how much you're earning on an hourly rate? I'm somewhere below a 3rd world child labourer.
Maddwriter said:It takes as long as it takes. Every person writes differently. Steven King can write a novel in a few months.Tolkien took a decade to write Lord of the Rings.
Bebbet said:My first novel took me about a year (first draft), but it wasn't until halfway through that I actually realised I wanted to make a proper go of it and knuckled down to some serious writing. Even then, I get distracted very easily and could go days, even weeks without writing a word.
My attention's been all over the place while trying to write my 2nd. I started it mid '04, but in the beginning I was constantly going back to the first to edit and rewrite in preparation for it being published by PA (time I now consider waisted). I got to the halfway point towards the end of last summer, but my head was a bit of a mess for the majority of last year, so the story is quite disjointed in need of so much work I can't really move on until I've fixed it.
With focus, I'm confident I could write a novel within a year - perhaps even the 2nd draft.
There's a lesson here: If Stephen King took as long as Tolkien with his writing, perhaps the majority of his bibliography wouldn't be so crap.
Jamesaritchie said:Hey! Don't be putting down my man. King may be the second best living writer out there. Love, love, love his writing. Just doesn't get any better than that.
Bebbet said:He just throws novels together with whatever material he has at the time, and every now and then all the parts are just right.
Jamesaritchie said:Hey! Don't be putting down my man. King may be the second best living writer out there. Love, love, love his writing. Just doesn't get any better than that.
http://www.kristinekathrynrusch.com/
Bebbet said:There's a lesson here: If Stephen King took as long as Tolkien with his writing, perhaps the majority of his bibliography wouldn't be so crap.
Bebbet said:Don't get me wrong, I admire King and he's written some fantastic work. And Kingdom Hospital showed he's a great screen writer too. But for every great thing he's written, there are two more that were absolute trash and read as if they'd been spewed out just to pay the bills.
It seems very much like production-line writing. He just throws novels together with whatever material he has at the time, and every now and then all the parts are just right.
Jamesaritchie said:But real writers write. They write each and every day. They park their butts in chairs and they write. When any writer does this, a lot of things get written. Good writers do not need to sit around thinking for three weeks, and writing for three days.
Was Shakespeare a production line? Was Dickens a production line? No, they were simply men who actually deserved to be called writers because they actually sat down and wrote.
.
chaostitan said:I have yet to sit down and bang one out without taking some sort of break.