Constant Action

Status
Not open for further replies.

Akuma

Rare Writer Pokemon
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
1,034
Reaction score
334
Location
Colorado
I once heard that it was best to write with constant action, something is always happening, bim-bam-boom!
While I agree that the reader should never be left bored, I also wonder if the readers--or the characters themselves--ever nseed to take a breath.
Can you tell what sort of action I should be keeping up, if any at all? Constant confrontations doesn't seem right, because what about the rising action my English teachers have all yammered on about?

Let me pose you my predicament:
My characters are fugitives, hurtling towards the final confrontation with the government's most difficult individuals. However, sometimes **** happens, and what's new is that one of my characters is dying from a sickness.

Now, I've had the group stop at a hospital, where some will legitimately purchase healing for more practical injuries (broken bones, yadda yadda yadda) as the others illegally search for the needed antidote. I'm still trying to figure out as to why they're doing this; they're afraid of identification and yet have plenty of money. I realize I'm going to have to make up a reason or delete pages. :(

Anyways, my characters are doing what I just did--sidetracking. Ugh, I hope you kind of understand what I'm getting at. Don't the characters themselves need a break? It seems heartless to put them in constant peril!

Then again, One Damn Thing After Another, right?

Hope I'm making sense.
EmoteShrug.gif
 

Linda Adams

Soldier, Storyteller
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 2, 2005
Messages
4,422
Reaction score
641
Location
Metropolitan District of Washington
Website
www.linda-adams.com
I think what you might have heard is something more along the lines of there must be story action, not physical action. There should always been something happening in the story or with the characterizations to keep it moving foward. For example, I critted a writer who spent ten page simply describing the trees and woods ... and then again in the next chapter while nothing happened.

Physical action scenes should be paced so they have peaks and valleys. Too much sustained action for too long actually becomes quite boring even though there may be a lot of action going on. One of the things I do before a big action scene is I slow the story down--a "valley"--and then ramp it up as I get near the action scene. It's actually more exciting that way because it gives the reader a break in the tension.

Plus, all action and nothing else doesn't allow opportunities for development of other parts of the story. It's awfully hard to describe a character or setting or talk about a friendship or backstory when you're racing through a chase scene--too disruptive to the scene. But all of that kind of stuff can be story action and still move the story forward, just at a different pace.

A last note: Take a lot of time to come up with a good reason why the characters are doing this. Co-writer and I spent a lot of time spinning our wheels on our project because we did not have a high enough stake up front--we had to do a massive rewrite to fix all the problems that caused. Make sure that whatever stakes the characters have merit the amount of action in the story.

Tomorrow or in the next few days I believe Vision will post up my article on writing action scenes (talk about timing)--might be worth a look. http://lazette.net/vision/
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
Action

Characters, and readers, need a chance to catch their breaths, to laugh, to rest. Over the course of a novel, constant action of any sort gets just as boring as no action at all. A good read is a roller coaster ride with ups and downs, peaks and valleys, not a plunge off a sheer cliff.
 

zarch

GOML.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Messages
333
Reaction score
38
Location
Texas
Jamesaritchie said:
Characters, and readers, need a chance to catch their breaths, to laugh, to rest. Over the course of a novel, constant action of any sort gets just as boring as no action at all. A good read is a roller coaster ride with ups and downs, peaks and valleys, not a plunge off a sheer cliff.

I agree completely. And did you say "plunge?" Can you skewer off a cliff?
 

MarkN

Altogether Ookie
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
271
Reaction score
54
Location
Pittsburgh area
Website
nutterwriter.wordpress.com
I picked up a book by Clive Cussler, whom I'd never read before, just to see what his writing was like. (I think that was the author.) Anyway, I was reading along, and this self-employed prospector in Colorado stumbled on an ancient room buried deep in a mountain. Ancient writing on the walls, etc. Called in an expert in ancient inscriptions. She gets there, and is taken to the site by a local professor or something. When they get in the room,

There's a cave-in.

Then there's an explosion.

Then icy water starts to rise, threatening to drown them.

Then a diver from a nearby cave (!) comes to rescue them.

Then he doesn't have enough air to rescue more than one at a time.

Bear in mind, I'm only a few pages into the book, which is all the farther I ever got. My BS detector overloaded and I found something else to read. It just struck me as too much climax too quick and too contrived, and I think it was precisely the result of trying too hard to achieve "constant action." It just didn't work for me. Of course, Clive Cussler appears to be a big seller, so what do I know, but I thought the story was made of tin.
 

Shadow_Ferret

Court Jester
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Messages
23,708
Reaction score
10,661
Location
In a world of my own making
Website
shadowferret.wordpress.com
I concur with what everyone said (except the Clive Cussler comments ;)). Constant action wears everyone out and you need to take a nap. A good thrilling story should have peaks and valleys.


I remember reading a book like that (can't recall the author, a fairly well-known horror/thriller writer) and this guy was on the run from the government. Story was non-stop black helicopters, guys in dark sedans and dark suits, all chasing him until the climax. I was exhausted when the story was over. As you can see the story left quite an impact on me. I can't even remember the author's name. ;)
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,159
Location
The right earlobe of North America
Akuma said:
I once heard that it was best to write with constant action, something is always happening, bim-bam-boom!
While I agree that the reader should never be left bored, I also wonder if the readers--or the characters themselves--ever nseed to take a breath.

You just answered your own question.

caw.
 

MadScientistMatt

Empirical Storm Trooper
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
1,692
Reaction score
252
Location
near Atlanta, Georgia
Website
madscientistmatt.blogspot.com
MarkN said:
Bear in mind, I'm only a few pages into the book, which is all the farther I ever got. My BS detector overloaded and I found something else to read. It just struck me as too much climax too quick and too contrived, and I think it was precisely the result of trying too hard to achieve "constant action." It just didn't work for me. Of course, Clive Cussler appears to be a big seller, so what do I know, but I thought the story was made of tin.

The key to enjoying a Clive Cussler novel is to keep your BS detector turned off at all times. :) Think of it as the written equivalent of a mindless action movie.
 

Sage

Our Lady of Parentheticals
Super Moderator
Moderator
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
69,231
Reaction score
34,446
Age
46
Location
Cheering you all on!
I remember when I was in high school & our english class read MacBeth, & our teacher pointed out that one of the things that made the horror aspects of the play so horrific were the moments of humor in between. At time I was like, "Well, you would think that non-stop horror would be scarier than getting an occasional laugh in there," but as I grew up, I realized that he was absolutely right. The less intense moments in your novel give the audience a chance to relax & let down their guard a little for when you throw the next intense situation at them.

A few months ago I was trying a book my friend recommended. I like the style of writing & the plot seemed interesting enough, but there was absolutely no hope in it. Bad stuff happened to the MC, then more, then more, all with no hope in sight. I know you're supposed to do the absolute worst stuff to your characters, but if you don't give the reader a reason to take a breath in between, to have hope that they're going to succeed anywhere, you'll quickly depress your audience. Same with throwing action sequence after action sequence at them. They'll get overwhelmed. Or worse, they'll be numb by the time they get to your climax, when the really bad sh!t is supposed to hit the fan.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
MarkN said:
I picked up a book by Clive Cussler, whom I'd never read before, just to see what his writing was like. (I think that was the author.) Anyway, I was reading along, and this self-employed prospector in Colorado stumbled on an ancient room buried deep in a mountain. Ancient writing on the walls, etc. Called in an expert in ancient inscriptions. She gets there, and is taken to the site by a local professor or something. When they get in the room,

There's a cave-in.

Then there's an explosion.

Then icy water starts to rise, threatening to drown them.

Then a diver from a nearby cave (!) comes to rescue them.

Then he doesn't have enough air to rescue more than one at a time.

Bear in mind, I'm only a few pages into the book, which is all the farther I ever got. My BS detector overloaded and I found something else to read. It just struck me as too much climax too quick and too contrived, and I think it was precisely the result of trying too hard to achieve "constant action." It just didn't work for me. Of course, Clive Cussler appears to be a big seller, so what do I know, but I thought the story was made of tin.

You should finish the book. Cussler starts off with slam bang action, but he, too, has peaks and valleys.

But, yeah, a BS detector and a Cussler novel probably are natural enemies. Still, I've grown fond of some of his novels.
 

Pike

Chivalry ain't dead
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
2,428
Reaction score
741
Location
Home. Work. Home. You know the drill.
Website
www.spikeo.bravejournal.com
Sage said:
I remember when I was in high school & our english class read MacBeth, & our teacher pointed out that one of the things that made the horror aspects of the play so horrific were the moments of humor in between. At time I was like, "Well, you would think that non-stop horror would be scarier than getting an occasional laugh in there," but as I grew up, I realized that he was absolutely right. The less intense moments in your novel give the audience a chance to relax & let down their guard a little for when you throw the next intense situation at them.

Yep, yep. This is a bit of a digression, but a friend told me of a new band called Vengence Sevenfold (I believe that's the name) and insisted I listen to their current track that's playing on the radio. It was busy. The song kept a solid, frenzied pace that never let up. Understand, I like my music loud and hard like old Metallica or Pantera, but they altered their pace, picked up the tempo then settled back. Changing the pace works. Stretch out the important parts, drawing the readers attention to the little details that matter. Then, hit them hard and fast. Every time you switch gears, you'll signify a shift in pace, scene, emotions, or POV. It's also important to make those shifts where they're most effetcive and necessary, not just down shifting in the middle of the freeway.
 

dantem42

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 12, 2005
Messages
344
Reaction score
25
Location
Philippines
Jamesaritchie said:
But, yeah, a BS detector and a Cussler novel probably are natural enemies. Still, I've grown fond of some of his novels.

About the only master of nonstop action that I can handle reading is Jeffrey Deaver (known especially for the Lincoln Rhyme novels). And I have to pick the right day (when I don't give a damn about character development).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.