"Mood and tone are often overlooked entirely by new writers."
Jamesaritchie dixit.
Now, if only I could understand what it means...
Help, please!
Jamesaritchie dixit.
Now, if only I could understand what it means...
Help, please!
Let us take the question “Do you know where the mail is?”
What is the action? Well, like music underneath, the meaning or impact of the sentence changes depending on our action. Try it like this:
“To beg” Do you know where the mail is?
“To scold” Do you know where the mail is?
“To console” Do you know where the mail is?
“To inquire” Do you know where the mail is?
And you can definitely see where it can become like putting scary music under the line, or putting clown music under it. And you can also see where, in the overall context of a script we can most definitely decide where and when certain action “choices” are WRONG. If the original underlying intent of the author (and of the play itself) was for your character just to come in and ask the very simple question “Do you know where the mail is?”
loquax said:... I always thought the "tone" was the choice of words, and the "mood" was the overall feeling your words and dialogue and situation amounted to. But.... mistook said it's the other way round. Help!
Mistook said:Look at the big picture... forest for the trees... etc.
I see...Mistook said:I see so much niggling over apostrophe's and pointless little details
loquax said:"The table stood in the centre of the room."
"The table rested in the middle of the room."
The sentences are synonymous, yet each have different tones. For me, "middle" is a much softer word than "centre". When talking about a table, "stood" and "rested" mean exactly the same thing, but they evoke different emotions. !
Mistook said:Again, I'm sorry to always come out sounding contrary, but I see so much niggling over apostrophe's and pointless little details, as if this is the level at which a story is made or broken. It's NOT! Words are your last concern. Your primary objective should be to have a story worth writing at all. Without that, no mastery of vocabulary can save you.
Look at the big picture... forest for the trees... etc.
Mistook said:Words are your last concern. Your primary objective should be to have a story worth writing at all. Without that, no mastery of vocabulary can save you.
Misktook said:Look at the big picture... forest for the trees... etc.
MarkN said:Maybe it's worth mentioning too that setting the mood/tone is part of polishing the story, or at least that's how I'm writing right now. My first draft, I'm just blurting everything out to get it all on paper--laying down the first coat of paint, as it were. The rewrite is when I'm going to go back over word choices and atmosphere and overall tone (among other things).
Mistook said:But for some reason, aspiring novelists want to start with a grab-bag of brilliant individual words and expect to connect them like leggo blocks into something meaningful. Tone is not choice of words. Tone is somtheing that exists before you put your story into words. Mood exists before words. Plot exists before words. You rough all those larger issues out in your mind at least before you commit to a first draft, and then you go back and polish and revise that draft to groove better with your tone, mood, etc.
Nobody on this thread suggested you should rate style and technique over story. The point is that even if you know what you're going to say, you shouldn't "throw the words together".Mdlle. Nancy said:Exactly...you have to know what you're saying before you start throwing words together. That way you aren't trying to force the words together--you're just taking ones that fit inside the overarching feeling.