sources for magazine articles

Becky

Hi,

I'm a lurker who finally decided to join in. I'm interested in writing non-fiction articles for children's magazines, but I need a little guidance.

What do editors expect with regards to research/sources? Are they only interested in interviews/primary sources? Are any websites considered reliable, or are only print sources allowed? Must the print sources be primary? For example, when researching Jonas Salk, I found an article in Life Magazine - can that be a source? Is it possible to research articles on science and history topics from "the sticks" of the Midwest, or do I need access to experts, universities, etc.

I appreciate any help or suggestions you can give.

Becky
 

Tish Davidson

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,626
Reaction score
110
I don't see why it wouldn't be a source. Since Salk died in 1995, its not like you're going to be able to interview him.

Some Web sources are considered authoritative. Examples: US government sites like National Institutes of Health, National Center for Health Care Statistics, Food and Drug Administration You can access all US gov't sites through www.firstgov.gov.

Other sites considered authoritative are those run by professional organizations such as the American Medical Association or well-known charity organizations like the American Cancer Society. Internationally, sites like the British Museum site or the Nobel Prize organization site are fine. So are online versions of print sources such as the New York Times or various professional journals.

What to avoid: Wikipedia and similar contributor run, non-edited sites; people's blogs (unless you want opnions), corporate sites with obvious biases, individual's sites unless you can verify their credentials independently. You have to be careful with .edu sites. Many are run by the university or specific departments within the university and have accurate, credible information, but students and faculty are usually given.edu addresses and allowed to build their own Web sites, and these are not necessarily accurate or unbiased. There are also Web sites that are run by splinter/opposition groups that vary in accuracy - for example, anti-vaccination people who cite various studies that allegedly show that vaccination is the cause of autism. It is often useful to look at these sites and sometimes to quote from them to give another side of the story, but you have to be careful about accepting statements as "facts" because they are often rather stretched interpretations of data.

If you find a university expert's Web site that looks like the person would be a good source, you can always e-mail them and ask if you can interview them by phone or send them a couple of questions by e-mail to answer. Most are agreeable to this. If you want corporate quotes, call or e-mail the company's media relations/public relations (different companies have different names for this function) and ask them to set up an interview with one of their corporate experts. This is part of the job of media relations employees. Some good sources if you are doing research on children's health problems, for example, specialized children's hospitals like Children's Hospital in Philadelphia or the Lucile Packard Children's Hospital associated with Stanford University in Palo Alto, CA are good sources. Access them through media relations. Almost every big city has a specialized children's hospital. If you're looking for facts and figures, professional trade organizatons are often helpful.

Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:

spike

Mostly Ignored
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 10, 2005
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
151
Location
Bath, Pennsylvania
Website
oddgoose.blogspot.com
Becky said:
Hi,

I'm a lurker who finally decided to join in. I'm interested in writing non-fiction articles for children's magazines, but I need a little guidance.

What do editors expect with regards to research/sources? Are they only interested in interviews/primary sources? Are any websites considered reliable, or are only print sources allowed? Must the print sources be primary? For example, when researching Jonas Salk, I found an article in Life Magazine - can that be a source? Is it possible to research articles on science and history topics from "the sticks" of the Midwest, or do I need access to experts, universities, etc.

I appreciate any help or suggestions you can give.

Becky

Get a couple of back issues of the magazines you want to query and see what type of sources they use.

Obviously, a bio piece for first and second graders can use more general sources than an indepth piece for high schoolers.

Regardless of where you live, you should have a library near by. My local library can get books from libraries across the state, including universities.

I wouldn't use web sources, but use the web sites bibliography to find your source material. This can be a lot quicker than a library search.

Good luck!
 

Becky

Thanks so much for your input. Now I just need to get myself in gear and start writing:)

Becky
 

Tish Davidson

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,626
Reaction score
110
spike said:
I wouldn't use web sources, but use the web sites bibliography to find your source material. This can be a lot quicker than a library search.

I don't see the difference between getting an article out of the New York Times online archive and going to the library and getting the same article on microfilm. Can you explain why you are so opposed to Web sources?
 

spike

Mostly Ignored
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 10, 2005
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
151
Location
Bath, Pennsylvania
Website
oddgoose.blogspot.com
Tish Davidson said:
I don't see the difference between getting an article out of the New York Times online archive and going to the library and getting the same article on microfilm. Can you explain why you are so opposed to Web sources?

"I" am not opposed to Web sources, but I'm not an editor. I think the web is a great place to research.

However, editors are the ones who are requiring primary resources, which is code for no internet resources.

I don't think that someone referencing the NY Times online archive was the problem. The Times archive would be considered a primary source. If I implied otherwise, mea culpa.

Of course, the microfilm can't be hacked, spoofed or just deleted because it takes up too much server space.

I believe the problem is other web sources that are not reliable or permanent. Or perhaps they have had trouble checking facts because web sites come and go.

Or maybe they all watched the movie "Shattered Glass" and realized how easy it is to fake sources on the web and trick a magazine editor.

Or maybe, because editors edit magazines and books, they want you to use magazines and books as resources.

I don't know. But when submitting unsolicited articles that will compete against hundreds of other submissions, it's best not to give them an easy reason to reject your work.