• This forum is specifically for the discussion of factual science and technology. When the topic moves to speculation, then it needs to also move to the parent forum, Science Fiction and Fantasy (SF/F).

    If the topic of a discussion becomes political, even remotely so, then it immediately does no longer belong here. Failure to comply with these simple and reasonable guidelines will result in one of the following.
    1. the thread will be moved to the appropriate forum
    2. the thread will be closed to further posts.
    3. the thread will remain, but the posts that deviate from the topic will be relocated or deleted.
    Thank you for understanding.​

What "force" to use on a futuristic fence?

vrabinec

Dipwad
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Messages
738
Reaction score
85
Location
Broken Arrow, OK
Website
vrabinec-fred.blogspot.com
I'm wracking my brain here, and I'm coming up short. It's really quite humbling. Anyway, I need my military government to put up a fence that consists of tall posts with some sort of force they emit between them to form the barrier, and I'm striking out. I don't want to go with laser. It has to be visible, so something like powerful x-rays or microwaves probably wouldn't work. Any suggestions?
 

vrabinec

Dipwad
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Messages
738
Reaction score
85
Location
Broken Arrow, OK
Website
vrabinec-fred.blogspot.com
It's a fence erected as a barrier to encircle a city. I want it to be a bit violent, maybe something that got rejected as a border fence because people crossing disregarded the warning signs and got fried or hurt somehow, and the military picked up the technology. I was thinking of frying anything that tried to penetrate, but blasting might work as well. Kind of a motion detector that zaps.
 

Al Stevens

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Messages
2,537
Reaction score
217
Just make something up. The "sub-phased ionic field array," or something silly like that. That's how we got "flux capacitor," "holodeck," and so on.
 

vrabinec

Dipwad
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Messages
738
Reaction score
85
Location
Broken Arrow, OK
Website
vrabinec-fred.blogspot.com
Making something up is my last resort. I'd love to give the readers something that might be plausible. I've kept everything else plausible up to now, and this is the last gizmo I have left to describe.
 

JSDR

wants moar baddassery.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 18, 2011
Messages
872
Reaction score
166
Location
probably at school
A gaseous form of flesh-eating microbes contained in a sheet of air maintained at a specific temperature?

ETA: They'd be irradiated, of course, so you could see them....
 

Al Stevens

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Messages
2,537
Reaction score
217
You might have to make it up. We don't have real force fields yet. ("Shields up, Scotty!") A laser array could, when a beam is broken, ignite something, but you don't want to use lasers, so that's out. Maybe motion detectors.
 

RichardGarfinkle

Second Edition and Second Laughter
Super Moderator
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
12,593
Reaction score
7,085
Location
Swimming in the Shallows
Website
www.richardgarfinkle.com
One of the problems with most fields that could actually be put up is that they would interact with the atmosphere as much as they would interact with people. But if you have motion detecters nearly anything nasty would work.

The trickiest thing about this is that any tech like this will have implications elsewhere. For example, if the fence blasts people with high energy positrons then you have the means to create high energy positrons on the cheap. Which means you would have other tech that uses high energy positrons such as bombs or power supplies using electron-positron annihilation.

There isn't a particle or field available from physics that doesn't have this kind of implication somewhere.

The safest things to use in terms of implications are light (lasers, masers, etc) or electricity.

You can use sonic effects if you want. They produce a number of interesting effects:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_weaponry
 

Fins Left

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
439
Reaction score
32
Have you looked at milimeter wave devices? They're already using them in the field and proposing them for a prison system in California. They basically "burn" the victim. They're not supposed to create permanent damage, but a video of a guy who allowed himself to get 'blasted' made it look really painful.

An advanced version of this, with high enough energy and wide enough path might cook anything that tried to go through it? BUT, you can also shield yourself from it under the right circumstances.

I think Ratheon was the manufacturer promoting them to the military for crowd control.
 

Teinz

Back at it again.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 20, 2010
Messages
2,440
Reaction score
186
Location
My favourite chair by the window.
How about a series of Van de Graaff generators.

Or a hedge of genetically enhanced Poison Ivy.

Or a wall made out of retractable, unclimbable, steel slabs that swing up everytime someone comes close.

Specially trained and adapted predators that tear up anyone who crosses the line...
 

benbradley

It's a doggy dog world
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
20,321
Reaction score
3,513
Location
Transcending Canines
I don't know what your objection is, but I would use a laser (or several). As far as activating it, there's already technology such as Microsoft's Kinect that can measure how far away someone is from a distance, so it could activate well before someone steps in between the posts.

This may not be quite what you were describing, but I'm thinking of something that's a deterrent as well as a defense (this is how I think it "should" work - a device that just has a sign that says "Warning, this will kill you" may collect the bodies of young children and those who can't read English). When you get within ten feet it shines a red laser on you, the low-power handheld kind - it won't hurt you unless you have the bad luck of it shining directly into your eye, but it demonstrates the point that you've been detected. As you get closer the real stuff turns on, such as the millimeter-wave RF beam already mentioned (it's like a microwave oven, but at a higher frequency, so it just barely pentrates the skin and heats up your pain-detecting nerves) that causes a burning feeling. If you somehow continue and get between the post, things (could be microwave, could be infrared laser, whatever) turn on full throttle and you catch on fire.

This system will easily enough to deter a casual person (or animal) who may accidentally get too close, but trying to run between the posts is instant suicide.
 

Snick

Sockpuppet
Banned
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
934
Reaction score
86
Location
Havatoo
If it is static until something is detected, then the lasers would work, but that idea of van der Graf geneerators would be interesting. I was thinkg static electricty even before I saw that.

Another possibility would be something that Ionized whatever was in range - stripped the electrons and suppressed the charge for a brief time, then restored the harges on the particles and allowed them to interact normally. It would result in molecular bonds breaking, and then there would be a high voltage charge on everything for a short time. If it only acted on the outermost layers of anything, then it might not kill, but it would mess things p.
 

FalconMage

Rob J. Vargas
Sockpuppet
Banned
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
218
Reaction score
17
Location
Midwest, USA
High frequency sound generators? Lethal or non-lethal explosive devices on vibration-sensitive mounts?
 

vrabinec

Dipwad
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Messages
738
Reaction score
85
Location
Broken Arrow, OK
Website
vrabinec-fred.blogspot.com
I would think the "light" portion would have to be visible at all times to avoid someone coming at the thing at high speeds from having to stop on a dime. And that way I can give the reader a visual of a swirling blue or red wall like a plane of light makes coming through the shutters into a roomfull of smoke. I could do that with lasers that oscilated up and down a couple hundred times a second or something like that. That's cool.

The van Der Graf generators could be cool. I could make the posts look like a stack of metalic balls, but I'm worried about the rage. I'm encircling a city, so the posts need to cover a space even if they're placed about a half mile apart. I'd think it would need to be something more focused. The millimeter waves look promising. So far that looks like a winner. I could make massive generators at one end with some kind of conical amplifiers on each post that receive the waves, make sure they don't dissipate, and fire them on to the next post. Sound plausible enough? I mean, if they're using them for space technology, then they definitely have the range, all I'm doing is boosting the power above what today's technology allows. (Unless our military has something up its sleeve that isn't showing up on the internet.)
 

Future Shock

Sockpuppet
Banned
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
22
Reaction score
3
I would think the "light" portion would have to be visible at all times to avoid someone coming at the thing at high speeds from having to stop on a dime. And that way I can give the reader a visual of a swirling blue or red wall like a plane of light makes coming through the shutters into a roomfull of smoke. I could do that with lasers that oscilated up and down a couple hundred times a second or something like that. That's cool.

The van Der Graf generators could be cool. I could make the posts look like a stack of metalic balls, but I'm worried about the rage. I'm encircling a city, so the posts need to cover a space even if they're placed about a half mile apart. I'd think it would need to be something more focused. The millimeter waves look promising. So far that looks like a winner. I could make massive generators at one end with some kind of conical amplifiers on each post that receive the waves, make sure they don't dissipate, and fire them on to the next post. Sound plausible enough? I mean, if they're using them for space technology, then they definitely have the range, all I'm doing is boosting the power above what today's technology allows. (Unless our military has something up its sleeve that isn't showing up on the internet.)

You don't have to have both components match up. Meaning you can have a visible representation of the fence without that being the actual deterrent. So a laser light fence (visual reminder) with non-lethal sonic as the actual force (deterrent).

Also, you'd need something that could physically stop objects. Even in a high tech future, the most practical means to do so would be physical barriers up to and including Star Trek level tech. Today we have remote control cars. Hell, the MythBuster (and Hollywood SFX guys) can trick out full-sized cars up to a RC rig. They'll still have them in the future. You can design 100 little ways to stop various things, anti-radiowave field, electromagetic field, etc to try to stop all the ways to bypass the tech, or you can just have a wall. SF doesn't always mean the high tech solutions are the best.

What it ultimately comes down to is your story. What's most important in your story? Does it really matter what the fence is, and how it works?

How about LOW frequency sound generators? Look up the brown tone. :)

MythBusters busted it.
 

Darkarma

Master-Mage
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 26, 2011
Messages
91
Reaction score
4
Location
Eternity Gardens
Plasma encased by a magnetic field. Its currently how NASA is thinking to do future windows that are star trek big.

It would be extremely visible.
 

FalconMage

Rob J. Vargas
Sockpuppet
Banned
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
218
Reaction score
17
Location
Midwest, USA
How about LOW frequency sound generators? Look up the brown tone. :)
Mythbusters aside, low frequency is hard to direct.

That's why, in car audio, woofers (low-frequency speakers) can be in the trunk, while tweeters (high frequency speakers) have to be carefully placed and aimed.
 

Future Shock

Sockpuppet
Banned
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
22
Reaction score
3
Plasma encased by a magnetic field. Its currently how NASA is thinking to do future windows that are star trek big.

It would be extremely visible.

And this would be a nice nod to the planned tokamak reactors.

But I'm not sure what you mean. If this is a method to create a window (i.e. transparent enough to see through), then how is it also simultaneously "extremely visible"?
 

FalconMage

Rob J. Vargas
Sockpuppet
Banned
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
218
Reaction score
17
Location
Midwest, USA
Oh! Larry Niven! Monofilament line! It's how the puppetteer was decapitated in Ringworld. It could be reactive like fiberoptic line, so you shine a light signal through it, maybe even a flashing light.

And the results could be quite... dramatic depending on how tight you weave the fiber.
 

Darkarma

Master-Mage
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 26, 2011
Messages
91
Reaction score
4
Location
Eternity Gardens
And this would be a nice nod to the planned tokamak reactors.

But I'm not sure what you mean. If this is a method to create a window (i.e. transparent enough to see through), then how is it also simultaneously "extremely visible"?

I suspect visibility would be largely related to how its set up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_window What I was referring to, was ages ago on the NASA channel that I saw something about it. But for the purposes of a fence I suspect a larger amount of plasma or a specific kind being used would likely be visible. Or at the very least, someone might notice and magnetic metal their wearing might be a bit reactive in its presence.

As for the Tokamak, I was in the one in San Diego. Field trip, my physics professor works there as his main job. One of the coolest days I've ever had.
 

FOTSGreg

Today is your last day.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 5, 2007
Messages
7,760
Reaction score
947
Location
A land where FTL travel is possible and horrible t
Website
Www.fire-on-the-suns.com
There are already seismic detectors designed to detect humans (supposedly used around Area 51 to keep unwelcome tourists out), invisible laser "tripwires" (we had one set up behind the animal building at LBNL), and a variety of other systems. Slave these to sentry guns (machine guns, recoil less rifles, automatic shotguns, flamethrowers, and grenade launchers, etc.) and you'd just have to occasionally send someone out to reload ammo and clean up the messes. No exotic technology needed.
 

vrabinec

Dipwad
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Messages
738
Reaction score
85
Location
Broken Arrow, OK
Website
vrabinec-fred.blogspot.com
What it ultimately comes down to is your story. What's most important in your story? Does it really matter what the fence is, and how it works?
No, it doesn't matter. It's a minor plot point. But there's a core of sci-fi readers that are relatively tech-savvy, and I want to do the best I can to make it plausible for them. I feel I owe it to them as a writer.
 

benbradley

It's a doggy dog world
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
20,321
Reaction score
3,513
Location
Transcending Canines
The "problem" with the brown tone is sound in air doesn't couple well into solid objects such as the human body, but a standing on a vibrating platform couples the vibrations very well, as I referenced here:
http://absolutewrite.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4777340&postcount=21
And yes, low-frequency sound is omnidirectional, but it diminishes in intensity from the source at the usual inverse-square rate of radiation.
Oh! Larry Niven! Monofilament line! It's how the puppetteer was decapitated in Ringworld. It could be reactive like fiberoptic line, so you shine a light signal through it, maybe even a flashing light.

And the results could be quite... dramatic depending on how tight you weave the fiber.
If we're getting that geeky, monofilament was earlier used in the novel "Stand On Zanzibar" (1968) in a nearly identical way, to cut people's heads off.
No, it doesn't matter. It's a minor plot point. But there's a core of sci-fi readers that are relatively tech-savvy, and I want to do the best I can to make it plausible for them. I feel I owe it to them as a writer.
And this will (IMHO, because I'm one of them geeks) make a substantial difference in the reviews such tech-savvy people write, and whether they'll buy your next novel.