FREE OFFICE SOFTWARE QUESTION

PeteDutcher

Twitter: @petedutcherjr
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
498
Reaction score
19
Location
Bradenton, FL, USA
Website
www.facebook.com
I know that Open Office adds a bunch of junk to documents, but has anyone tried Libre Office or Lotus Symphony?

Both are free, and I have them listed on my new website for downloads, but in regard to writing novels, how do they fare?

My new Website: The Dutcher Journal.

(my site doesn't officially launch until May 1...but it's live. Just going through adding of content and tweaks atm; doing it myself)

Thank for responses!
 

benbradley

It's a doggy dog world
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
20,321
Reaction score
3,513
Location
Transcending Canines
What kind of junk do you mean?

Libre Office is the new Open Office, so it almost certainly adds the same "junk," whatever that is. I've used both with no problem.

I haven't heard of Lotus Symphony in decades. I presume it's been updated (to run on, like, Microsoft Windows instead of MS-DOS - at least that's what Lotus 1-2-3 ran on).
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
It doesn't add any junk at all that you don't want added.
 

Cyia

Rewriting My Destiny
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
19,290
Reaction score
5,743
Location
Brillig in the slithy toves...
The only problem I ever had with OO was in opening Track Changes on a document saved with true Word. Mine always screwed up the changes, running them all together, or skipping lines so they pointed to the wrong one.
 

kuwisdelu

Revolutionize the World
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
38,197
Reaction score
4,544
Location
The End of the World
I know that Open Office adds a bunch of junk to documents,

No it doesn't. But it's not being maintained anymore, so don't bother using it anyway.

ETA: Well, it looks like Apache is taking over maintenance now...

but has anyone tried Libre Office or Lotus Symphony?

Both are free, and I have them listed on my new website for downloads, but in regard to writing novels, how do they fare?

Probably about the same. They're both based on the same OpenOffice.org code. However, Lotus Symphony is discontinued and being replaced with Apache OpenOffice IBM Edition.

I'd just go ahead and use LibreOffice if you need free.

I haven't heard of Lotus Symphony in decades. I presume it's been updated (to run on, like, Microsoft Windows instead of MS-DOS - at least that's what Lotus 1-2-3 ran on).

The new one is another fork of OpenOffice.org code by IBM, but according to the Wikipedia, they're already given up on it.
 

L.Blake

Soaking up information.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2012
Messages
171
Reaction score
7
Location
a state of contentment
Apache took over OO? Wow, I'm out of the loop. Thanks for the heads up. Do you use LibreOffice, Kuwisdelu? If you do use it, can use save files in all the different formats? I have stuff saved in doc and rtf.

Thanks
L.
 

Little Ming

Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
3,001
Reaction score
753
Apache took over OO? Wow, I'm out of the loop. Thanks for the heads up. Do you use LibreOffice, Kuwisdelu? If you do use it, can use save files in all the different formats? I have stuff saved in doc and rtf.

Thanks
L.

I use LO, and yes, you can open and save doc and rtf files.

I am curious to know what all this "junk" is though.

I've never used Lotus Symphony, but for a simple word processor (really simple ;) ) I like RoughDraft and Atlantis Nova.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
The OP likely had MS Office and Word confused with OpenOffice. MS Word is horrible for the amount of extraneous coding that gets embedded in documents. While OpenOffice can save in MS Word format it doesn't embed hardly anything in the document that I've seen so far.

Again, Word embeds only what you let it embed.
 

FalconMage

Rob J. Vargas
Sockpuppet
Banned
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
218
Reaction score
17
Location
Midwest, USA
Hi, Folks.

For "free" office software, look into Microsoft's SkyDrive. It's an online storage space, but it also lets you edit .doc files right in place. The Web interface is not a full instance of MS Word. Just putting it out there as an option.
 

ComicBent

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Messages
347
Reaction score
28
Location
Tennessee
The LibreOffice suite is great. I used the old Open Office.org suite until LibreOffice "forked" into its own version.

LibreOffice produces a fairly small file. It does not load any junk into the file that I am aware of.

I just downloaded the most recent update tonight.

Google *libreoffice download*

and then choose the cnet.download site for the program itself. It downloaded twenty times faster from there than from libreoffice.org tonight for some reason. I finally just gave up on the libreoffice.org site.

However, you will need to go to libreoffice.org to download the help file. I did not see it on the cnet.download site.

Install the main program first; then the help file.

I recently had to buy Microsoft Office 2010. Sigh, what can I say? For anyone who has learned earlier versions well (Office 97, Office 2003), 2010 is an insulting joke. If Microsoft had not enjoyed a twenty-year monopoly in computing, Office 2007 and 2010 would have wrecked the company, and rightly so.
 

PeteDutcher

Twitter: @petedutcherjr
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
498
Reaction score
19
Location
Bradenton, FL, USA
Website
www.facebook.com
The OP likely had MS Office and Word confused with OpenOffice. MS Word is horrible for the amount of extraneous coding that gets embedded in documents. While OpenOffice can save in MS Word format it doesn't embed hardly anything in the document that I've seen so far.

No confusion at all. The junk I mentioned is explained in the Smashwords manual.

Microsoft Word is actually pretty clean. If you make coding visible you'll see that. The only fault I've found in it is in regard to bookmarks...you have to clean them up after you are done. Word tends to add extras to the bookmark listings.
 

PeteDutcher

Twitter: @petedutcherjr
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
498
Reaction score
19
Location
Bradenton, FL, USA
Website
www.facebook.com
The LibreOffice suite is great. I used the old Open Office.org suite until LibreOffice "forked" into its own version.

LibreOffice produces a fairly small file. It does not load any junk into the file that I am aware of.

I just downloaded the most recent update tonight.

Google *libreoffice download*

and then choose the cnet.download site for the program itself. It downloaded twenty times faster from there than from libreoffice.org tonight for some reason. I finally just gave up on the libreoffice.org site.

However, you will need to go to libreoffice.org to download the help file. I did not see it on the cnet.download site.

Install the main program first; then the help file.

I recently had to buy Microsoft Office 2010. Sigh, what can I say? For anyone who has learned earlier versions well (Office 97, Office 2003), 2010 is an insulting joke. If Microsoft had not enjoyed a twenty-year monopoly in computing, Office 2007 and 2010 would have wrecked the company, and rightly so.

Actually, I have the entire 2010 office suite for Microsoft. I was taken aback by the changes as well, but once you get use to them it is better than the old ones.

But I see your point, because learning how things are done in 2010 was confusing. I finally got it customized the way I like it.

I was asking about the others because of an article I'm working on for my new website at www.thedutcherjournal.com

(I'm putting together a "Prose Anatomy" column)
 

Al Stevens

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Messages
2,537
Reaction score
217
You might want to look at AbiWord. http://www.abisource.com/ It compares well with Open Office, LibreOffice Writer and Word.

ETA: It's missing a few features (e.g. tracked changes, PDF export), but they're working on it.
 
Last edited:

Alexys

Took a wrong turn at the Pleiades
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 5, 2011
Messages
341
Reaction score
30
Location
On the wrong planet. ;P
About AbiWord: it has minor display glitches (kerning not applied to variable-width fonts, text cursor hard-coded to black rather than allowed to take the platform colour, some others). How much of an annoyance things like that are depends on the user. It does have an equivalent of Word's old "normal" mode (the one that isn't paginated or tuned for Weblike display), which Open/Libre Office didn't, the last time I checked.

Calligra ( http://www.calligra.org ) is another alternative, now that it's finally hitting the release stage, but I haven't bothered to try it yet.
 

Al Stevens

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Messages
2,537
Reaction score
217
Abiword also has smooth scrolling with the arrow keys. Open and Libre both jump the display a half page when the cursor hits the margin. Drives me nuts.
 

thothguard51

A Gentleman of a refined age...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
9,316
Reaction score
1,065
Age
74
Location
Out side the beltway...
Actually, I have the entire 2010 office suite for Microsoft. I was taken aback by the changes as well, but once you get use to them it is better than the old ones.

But I see your point, because learning how things are done in 2010 was confusing. I finally got it customized the way I like it.

I was asking about the others because of an article I'm working on for my new website at www.thedutcherjournal.com

(I'm putting together a "Prose Anatomy" column)

I have been using Office for years, full suite, and I have to agree that 2010 is better than previous versions.

The reason I stay with MS Office is because most agents, editors, and publishers use MS on their computers. I just feel its easier when you don't force the agents, editors, and publishers to convert your document into something they can read easily...

Maybe I am just overly cautious, or too old to learn new systems... :Shrug:
 

Williebee

Capeless, wingless, & yet I fly.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
20,569
Reaction score
4,814
Location
youtu.be/QRruBVFXjnY
Website
www.ifoundaknife.com
The reason I stay with MS Office is because most agents, editors, and publishers use MS on their computers. I just feel its easier when you don't force the agents, editors, and publishers to convert your document into something they can read easily...
I can agree with your reasoning -- wanting to use software that is compatible with the people you are pitching to, so I should probably point out that both Libre Office and Open Office will do a "one click - Save As" to the formats the agents desire. (MSOffice, pdf, Word Perfect... pretty much whatever.)
 

Maryn

I Tried
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
64,142
Reaction score
43,145
Location
Behind you!
Open Office can also be set so the default Save is in .doc form. That's what I did.

Maryn, technophobe
 

Al Stevens

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Messages
2,537
Reaction score
217
When an editor or beta reader tracks changes in Word to post corrections and comments (and expects the same in return), the other programs don't always process them properly if at all. In which case you need Word. I use 2002 for that feature alone.
 

Williebee

Capeless, wingless, & yet I fly.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
20,569
Reaction score
4,814
Location
youtu.be/QRruBVFXjnY
Website
www.ifoundaknife.com
When an editor or beta reader tracks changes in Word to post corrections and comments (and expects the same in return), the other programs don't always process them properly if at all. In which case you need Word. I use 2002 for that feature alone.

I've seen this, as well. Not enough (for me) at beta reading stage, to justify spending the money. At editor stage? Oh, heck yes.
 

Calliopenjo

Esteemed thinker
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 22, 2008
Messages
892
Reaction score
51
Location
In a townhouse over looking the tumble weed fields
This reply isn't in direct response to the question but if you are looking for an alternative to MSWord, whatever version you have, there are alternatives to that.

If you have Chrome, they have a long list of writing apps that you could use. All free but one.

I use Write Space. It's a black screen with white print. It's nothing fancy. It's plain text.

The other I use is Zoho Writer. It's a basic word processing program. It has bold, underline, and italics capabilities. If there's a story you need to write this is a possibility. There are file exporting options: HTML, PDF, DOCX, DOC, etc.

Both of these are free and easy to use. At least it was for me after using MSWord for years.

Just an option.
 

benbradley

It's a doggy dog world
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
20,321
Reaction score
3,513
Location
Transcending Canines
There's also Google Docs, which is out there in Teh Cloud along with your document, you just go to the site with a web browser. I've not actually used it, except that one time Nov. 1st when someone was going for a 50k day for NaNoWriMo (NaNoWriDa?), and had a Google Doc set up for public viewing. It was fascinating, a readable fantasy novel was being written right in front of my eyes - it almost kept me from writing enough myself (oh, looky here). She only got to maybe 30k, because she stopped for a short midday nap but misset her alarm clock. Another Atlanta ML DID write 50k that day.

But I think Google Docs is also "supposably" MS Word compatible.