Race

Slyest Fox

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
231
Reaction score
12
Location
Sometimes LA, Mosttimes Chicago.
So, I have a question about race. I have quite a few non-white characters in my book, and sometimes I'm not quite sure how to make this clear in the description or whether it's even important enough to. Sometimes the last name's make it reasonably obvious. One of the main characters is hispanic, and I assume that just giving her last name as Rojas as well as details like her having black hair makes this clear enough. But not every ethnicity has tell-tale names like that.

To use an example, some girls are starting an internship at a political campaign, and the campaign manager (named Scott Deveaux which gives a way no obvious ethnicity) is black. Right now, when he first shows, I mention that a black man hurried by but it just feels awkward to my eyes, since when white people show up I don't say "a white man hurried by." Should I just not even mention it until it would come up more naturally? Him being black isn't important to the story, it's just how I picture him, like a character having blonde hair or glasses or something. But he's an important enough character that he warrants description, he's not just a one-scene wonder or anything.

What's more, another character's ex-boyfriend who is a huge part of the series but not such a big part of this first book is half-black which feels even more awkward to say. But we see enough of Caleb in the series that it feels like something I should mention. His race is a little bit important because he's noticeably half-black while the rest of his siblings are just black, which sets the stage for a white character we meet possibly being his father.

How do you guys address this?
 
Last edited:

Mharvey

Liker Of Happy Things
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Messages
1,861
Reaction score
235
Location
The Nexus
When describing blacks, I just use "dark-skinned" - never ran into any issues. Arabians/Middle Eastern "bronze-skinned".

Hispanics, I usually don't bother describing racially. I tend to just talk about them the way I would a white person and just let their last names do the talking. Not quite sure why. Maybe it's just because "brown-skinned" feels taboo and usually conjures an image of blacks, at least in my mind (your mileage may vary). I suppose "bronze-skinned" could also work for them as well, but for some reason, that conjures middle-eastern/Egyptian for me.

I describe "white", just not that way. "Pale-skinned" for extremely white... "Pink-skinned" also gets dropped once in awhile.

I also don't always use that exact order of words. I mix it up a bit. Also, if I base a scene in, say, Saudi Arabia, I'll stop describing every single person as "a bronze-skinned man with dark hair." If I did a place like Los Angeles, I'd probably be more quick to describe white people as white, as they are a minority in *a lot* of parts.
 
Last edited:

Mandiloo322

[Shhhh....I'm writing.]
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
856
Reaction score
42
Location
St. Louis, Missouri
What is the setting? If the characters are in a specific region, you might not need to worry about describing each non-white character as much.

I usually just say "pale" "tan" "bronze" or "dark" to describe varying skin colors.
 

missesdash

You can't sit with us!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
6,858
Reaction score
1,092
Location
Paris, France
There are a lot of questions about this in the POC (people of color) forum. Lots of good information and links on writing race as well.
 

nevillenox

I have promises to keep.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
91
Reaction score
1
Location
A place.
I, as others have said they do, usually describe the skin tone in "pale", "dark" or even "tanned" once in a while. And then I just leave it alone. Whatever you do, just don't go for the "chocolate", "cinnamon" or "mocha" terms. I've seen those so many times now and I bash my head into a wall every time I do.
 
Last edited:

Slyest Fox

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
231
Reaction score
12
Location
Sometimes LA, Mosttimes Chicago.
I, as others have said they do, usually describe the skin tone in "pale", "dark" or even "tanned" once in a while. And then I just leave it alone. Whatever you do, just don't go for the "chocolate", "cinnamon" or "mocha" terms. I've seen those so many times now and I bash my head into a wall every time I do.
Of course not! Wouldn't think of it! I certainly don't have a character that's referred to as having caramel-colored skin or anything! No sir-ee! Not me!
 

Missus Akasha

I'm a monster. I'm a saint.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
1,352
Reaction score
66
Location
Florida
I am a POC and I tend to describe my POC characters as 'dark-skinned' or having 'sepia brown skin' or a different shade of brown where people might be able to identify the character as black. Even I try not to rely on food items to describe my character's skin tone, but I'll admit that it's really hard not to because people identify with it easier. I mean if you describe a person has having chocolate brown skin then I think the reader might clearly identify the character has being black. However, all these descriptions are understood differently by each reader. What I mean is 'dark-skinned' to me means the character is black, but 'dark-skinned' to someone else may mean that the character is a white person with a dark tan.

A perfect example is the Hunger Games. Rue, a very important character to the series, was described as having dark brown skin, but a huge chunk of the fandom thought that she was white with a very dark tan. So come time the movies, many were shocked and some were upset to see that she was casted as a black girl.

Anyways, I think it's really great that you have such a diverse cast. There needs to be more diversity in YA! Good luck.
 

Spy_on_the_Inside

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 17, 2011
Messages
701
Reaction score
41
Location
Minnesota
I read a story where a girl was described as a 'light-skinned black girl'. I would almost think getting too flowery with describing a person's race can come across the wrong way too.

What do the rest of you think? Keep it simple or take a little artistic licence when it comes to describing someone's skin color?
 

Polenth

Mushroom
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
5,018
Reaction score
736
Location
England
Website
www.polenthblake.com
I read a story where a girl was described as a 'light-skinned black girl'. I would almost think getting too flowery with describing a person's race can come across the wrong way too.

What do the rest of you think? Keep it simple or take a little artistic licence when it comes to describing someone's skin color?

I'm generally a fan of keeping it simple. Trying to hedge around it often comes across as silly. Trying to get too poetical as what-were-you-thinking.

Something else to keep in mind is not to over-describe someone. It's great to keep it simple, but even simple terms can get too much in quantity.

"He was black. He raised his brown hand to his dark-skinned face. He wore a t-shirt, revealing the brown skin on his arms. His hair was black and his eyes so dark brown, as to look almost black, which matched his very dark skin. Did I mention, he was black?"

(I'd like to say I'm exaggerating, but I've read books with similar passages.)
 

missesdash

You can't sit with us!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
6,858
Reaction score
1,092
Location
Paris, France
@Polenth that's hilarious! Am I the only one who tends to leave descriptors out if I've already mentioned them? So when we first meet a character, they might twirl a lock of *red* hair around their finger, but any following reference to hair will leave out the color.

I remember thinking it was strange how many times Smeyer told us the color of Edward's eyes and that he was pale. Same goes for race I think.