describe a book using an adjective (not genre)

Status
Not open for further replies.

catian

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
848
Reaction score
22
Location
London, where the heart matters most
To Moderators: I hope this is the right forum to discuss this thread.
If it is not then apologies and if it could be moved somewhere where it would be more adequate.
Thank you in advance.


I was just thinking about all the adjectives that could apply to describe a story a book and I thought that if a descriptive word exists then it should adequatly apply to describe a book like you would describe a person.
words are because we humans needed to express an idea or a feeling.

so, would I get away with saying:

This is a loud book.

what does it evoke when you hear it?
 
Last edited:

quicklime

all out of fucks to give
Banned
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
8,967
Reaction score
2,077
Location
wisconsin
it evokes very little because my opinions may vary from yours and there are likely other attributes as well. You may mean it is loud because everything takes place in crowded places, you may mean the writing is given to ridiculous amounts of hyperbole, you may mean it is just very direct.....this is sort of like a single pinpoint on a length of string. Several more adjectives, and we can see the line take form, but from the single datapoint, it doesn't mean much at all.


playing along, and realizing again the single word means very little:

Anything by Dan Brown: Painful. (although again, what does this mean? In my case, I mean the writing is painful enough I get yanked from the story to groan, mumble "what the fuck?," re-read the passage out loud to make sure I'M not missing something, etc.....but someone else might describe Sparks as "painful" because all his love stories seem to end badly for the protagonist...)
 

catian

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
848
Reaction score
22
Location
London, where the heart matters most
it evokes very little because my opinions may vary from yours and there are likely other attributes as well. You may mean it is loud because everything takes place in crowded places, you may mean the writing is given to ridiculous amounts of hyperbole, you may mean it is just very direct.....this is sort of like a single pinpoint on a length of string. Several more adjectives, and we can see the line take form, but from the single datapoint, it doesn't mean much at all.


playing along, and realizing again the single word means very little:

Anything by Dan Brown: Painful. (although again, what does this mean? In my case, I mean the writing is painful enough I get yanked from the story to groan, mumble "what the fuck?," re-read the passage out loud to make sure I'M not missing something, etc.....but someone else might describe Sparks as "painful" because all his love stories seem to end badly for the protagonist...)
Painful is a strong word.
Did you read still read him albeit it painful?
 

Drachen Jager

Professor of applied misanthropy
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 13, 2010
Messages
17,169
Reaction score
2,283
Location
Vancouver
To me, if you describe a book as loud, it doesn't really tell me anything about the book. All it does is make me wonder if it's extremely loud.

There are just certain adjectives that do not fit with some nouns. You've picked one of those.

Aside from all that, you're not supposed to describe your book. You're supposed to SHOW what's in your book, not tell.
 

quicklime

all out of fucks to give
Banned
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
8,967
Reaction score
2,077
Location
wisconsin
Painful is a strong word.
Did you read still read him albeit it painful?


half.

it takes a lot of bad book for me to go "Oh, Jesus Christ, I'm just done." and quit, but Dan rose to the challenge admirably.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
I see.
You associate loud with sounds which interesting.:)
How about content wise what would you say a loud book is about?

Well, there are books, I think, that try to shout some message or another. I tend to leave such books unfinished, but I think "loud" would apply.
 

Drachen Jager

Professor of applied misanthropy
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 13, 2010
Messages
17,169
Reaction score
2,283
Location
Vancouver
Now it's not only incredibly loud, but extremely close.

Doesn't it just appear closer? I took out a tape measure and checked, my head is as close to the monitor as it usually is.

The pink is incredibly loud, I have to give you that.
 

Phaeal

Whatever I did, I didn't do it.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
9,232
Reaction score
1,898
Location
Providence, RI
As a sort of synaesthetic exercise, I would like to apply colors to books. Never Let Me Go is slate blue, definitely. The Lord of the Rings is all sorts of greens and golds. The DaVinci Code is neon yellow. Moby Dick is not white but teal, while The Scarlet Letter is an infinite wash of gray. The Color Purple is umber. Red Dragon actually is red. Go figure.
 

catian

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
848
Reaction score
22
Location
London, where the heart matters most
To me, if you describe a book as loud, it doesn't really tell me anything about the book. All it does is make me wonder if it's extremely loud.

There are just certain adjectives that do not fit with some nouns. You've picked one of those.

Aside from all that, you're not supposed to describe your book. You're supposed to SHOW what's in your book, not tell.
who says you cannot describe your book?
One has to describe it if one has to talk about it with others.
 

quicklime

all out of fucks to give
Banned
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
8,967
Reaction score
2,077
Location
wisconsin
who says you cannot describe your book?
One has to describe it if one has to talk about it with others.


I think what others are saying (and I would certainly agree) is two-fold:

1. I cannot describe my book (or anyone else's) in a single word. Not in any meaningful, realistic way.

2. the choice you made, "loud", does not work as a descriptor anyway.....because it isn't clear if that is the tone, the over-use of hyperbole or message, or what exactly you mean by "loud".
 

Drachen Jager

Professor of applied misanthropy
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 13, 2010
Messages
17,169
Reaction score
2,283
Location
Vancouver
who says you cannot describe your book?
One has to describe it if one has to talk about it with others.

You can describe it, certainly. But it's far more effective to show people why it's a good book than it is to use a bunch of semi-meaningless descriptors about the book.

"It's a great book, people are glued to the pages, you know, on the edges of their seats. There are twists and turns and dreams that might be real, but might not. It'll have you questioning reality, sort of like the Matrix, but not really. It's sad and sweet, there's some mystery, suspense and loads of drama."

"It's about this detective who is in a horrific car accident. When he wakes up he finds his wife is dead, but his son lived. At the end of the day he's exhausted, but instead of falling asleep, he wakes up in the hospital and his wife is alive, but his son is dead. Every time he falls asleep he switches realities, never knowing which (if either) is real." (not mine, describing an upcoming show)

I've over-simplified the example for effect, but I think you get the idea. One is telling about the book, one is showing about the book. Which one would you rather read?
 

Cyia

Rewriting My Destiny
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
19,313
Reaction score
5,813
Location
Brillig in the slithy toves...
If you have to tell me your book is funny, it's not.
If you have to tell me your book is suspenseful, it's not.
If you have to tell me your book is exciting, it's not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.