The 30 Harshest Author-on-Author Insults In History

Status
Not open for further replies.

childeroland

What happened to my LIFE?!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
2,764
Reaction score
120
Fun article on famous authors hating other famous authors. I knew about Nabokov's feelings for Dostoyevsky, and Faulkner's about Hemingway, but I had no idea about some of the others.

A sample:
25. Gertrude Stein on Ezra Pound
“A village explainer. Excellent if you were a village, but if you were not, not.”
24. Virginia Woolf on Aldous Huxley
“All raw, uncooked, protesting.”
23. H. G. Wells on George Bernard Shaw
“An idiot child screaming in a hospital.”
22. Joseph Conrad on D.H. Lawrence
“Filth. Nothing but obscenities.”
21. Lord Byron on John Keats (1820)
“Here are Johnny Keats’ piss-a-bed poetry, and three novels by God knows whom… No more Keats, I entreat: flay him alive; if some of you don’t I must skin him myself: there is no bearing the drivelling idiotism of the Mankin.”



http://flavorwire.com/188138/the-30-harshest-author-on-author-insults-in-history?all=1
 

Amadan

Banned
Joined
Apr 27, 2010
Messages
8,649
Reaction score
1,623
Old news, but I do like referring to these whenever we have another round of "It's unprofessional and mean for authors to utter anything but kittens and rainbows about other authors!" on AW.
 

HoneyBadger

terribly loud, emotionally distant
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
1,175
Reaction score
352
Location
Fort Wayne, IN
Website
twitter.com
Didn't King have something less than flattering to say about Steph Meyer? I can't remember the article, but he gave J.K. Rowling a thumbs up.

ETA: Didn't Wells and Verne exchange unpleasant thoughts or words?

Tri

Yessssss.

"The real difference is that Jo Rowling is a terrific writer and Stephenie Meyer can't write worth a darn," he said. "She's not very good."

And yessssss.

Click the link for a very funny comic.
 

jjdebenedictis

is watching you via her avatar
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
7,063
Reaction score
1,643
The problem with snarking on another author is you risk it coming across as professional jealousy, regardless of how valid your point is.

And indeed, if you're calling someone (rather than their book) a "village explainer" or "idiot child" or "[m]ankin", that smells of professional grudge, not valid literary criticism.

Doesn't mean you haven't got a right to say it. Just means you may be casting more light on your own flaws than the other guy's.
 

Amadan

Banned
Joined
Apr 27, 2010
Messages
8,649
Reaction score
1,623
The problem with snarking on another author is you risk it coming across as professional jealousy, regardless of how valid your point is.

And indeed, if you're calling someone (rather than their book) a "village explainer" or "idiot child" or "[m]ankin", that smells of professional grudge, not valid literary criticism.

Doesn't mean you haven't got a right to say it. Just means you may be casting more light on your own flaws than the other guy's.


Oh, I think a lot of those classic author snarks were just plain professional grudges.

But damn funny.
 

Alison_Kale

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 21, 2012
Messages
64
Reaction score
9
Location
Brooklyn. Almost.
Oh, Emerson and Twain, how could you be so unkind to my dear Miss Austen??

But I do like Baudelaire's snark on all of his country.
 

Delano

The Hammer of The Gods
Registered
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Location
Thomasville, North Cackalacky
The problem with snarking on another author is you risk it coming across as professional jealousy, regardless of how valid your point is.

I agree, though I have to say in the case of Stephen King's comment about Stephenie Meyer, there is no way anyone could interpret that as jealousy, lol.
 

rugcat

Lost in the Fog
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
16,339
Reaction score
4,111
Location
East O' The Sun & West O' The Moon
Website
www.jlevitt.com
Always been my favorite:

9. Truman Capote on Jack Kerouac

“That’s not writing, that’s typing.”

"The real difference is that Jo Rowling is a terrific writer and Stephenie Meyer can't write worth a darn," he said. "She's not very good."

That's not snark. It's reportage.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Messages
47,985
Reaction score
13,247
The problem with snarking on another author is you risk it coming across as professional jealousy, regardless of how valid your point is.

And indeed, if you're calling someone (rather than their book) a "village explainer" or "idiot child" or "[m]ankin", that smells of professional grudge, not valid literary criticism.

Doesn't mean you haven't got a right to say it. Just means you may be casting more light on your own flaws than the other guy's.
Meh. Other writers have the right to an opinion just as much as 'normal readers' do.

In fact in many cases their opinions could be more valid because they know what they're talking about.

With King's comment, he's well-respected and no-one could say he's jealous of Meyer's success. Well, maybe they could, but I'm sure he won't lose any sleep over it.
 

Mark W.

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 24, 2010
Messages
365
Reaction score
23
Location
Tennessee
Website
www.facebook.com
With HG Wells and Bernard Shaw, it could have been more personal than professional. Both were highly political figures.
 

Phaeal

Whatever I did, I didn't do it.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
9,232
Reaction score
1,898
Location
Providence, RI
Meh. I think a lot of authors suck, but unless they start torturing bunnies or condoning genocide or committing other superliterary crimes, I see no reason to call them out in public.

I might criticize a particular book, but the author herself? Only in private, with the very few people whose discretion I trust. We meet in a lead-shielded, insulated bunker far underground, lest we contribute to global warming via the ardor of our rants. ;)
 

jjdebenedictis

is watching you via her avatar
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
7,063
Reaction score
1,643
Meh. Other writers have the right to an opinion just as much as 'normal readers' do.

In fact in many cases their opinions could be more valid because they know what they're talking about.

With King's comment, he's well-respected and no-one could say he's jealous of Meyer's success. Well, maybe they could, but I'm sure he won't lose any sleep over it.
Yes, but he didn't call Meyer an idiot child either. We're not quite talking about the same thing.

Everyone has a right to voice their opinion. But as writers, we need to be aware of how words are interpreted.

And to have zero fear of pissing people off, of course. It's fine to be offensive as hell, as long as you do it on purpose. :D
 

Amadan

Banned
Joined
Apr 27, 2010
Messages
8,649
Reaction score
1,623
Harlan Ellison is my touchstone on literary snark. The man is fearless, and will call out any Emperor for being starkers.


I'd say he's not so much fearless as filterless.
 

dpaterso

Also in our Discord and IRC chat channels
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
18,805
Reaction score
4,600
Location
Caledonia
Website
derekpaterson.net
Their niggly little jibes make them all look like total prats. If they were alive and posting here, I'd tell them to just shut up and get some writing done. And maybe give them time outs.

-Derek
 

Haggis

Evil, undead Chihuahua
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
56,228
Reaction score
18,316
Location
A dark, evil place.
Dorothy Parker is always good for snark. So is Poe.
One of my favorites from Poe I remember reading as a child. Poe did a lot of literary criticism and said this about some long forgotten writer, "___ has as many angles as a pumpkin and is nearly as clever."

No link for it, and I can't find it on Google, but I remember it clear as day from a collection of his I had as a youth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.