- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Messages
- 488
- Reaction score
- 377
Just wondering how people feel about being left in the dark on the MC's name in a 1st POV? Like, dislike unnamed narrating MC? Do you need a reason written into the novel, or is it better left un-said? Do you think there are any intended effects of doing this, authorial tricks at play--when the narrator is left unnamed--or just laziness? Do you feel more like you are stepping into their shoes? Or is there an added kafka-esque mystery added? Does it make the novel feel colder, more black and white?
I am interested because my WIP has an unnamed narrator(MC). It was mostly laziness on my part--i just didn't have a name when i was starting out. Now everything is written this way--conversations naturally leave out his name, its not really needed in narration, etc. It feels right, so i will probably stick with it--but of course i am curious how other people feel on unnamed narrators.
I am interested because my WIP has an unnamed narrator(MC). It was mostly laziness on my part--i just didn't have a name when i was starting out. Now everything is written this way--conversations naturally leave out his name, its not really needed in narration, etc. It feels right, so i will probably stick with it--but of course i am curious how other people feel on unnamed narrators.