Have I missed it completely? Is there one I've overlooked? And why aren't more authors clamoring for something that protects them? I don't mean just a club of people who belong and share info, but I mean an association by which all members have made commitments to each other and the public. And the association, in turn, protects the writers etc.
I think the new dawn of self-publishing should have a membership group that does the following:
1. Requires a membership fee, yearly/monthly? And for that fee it
I won't say this will fix anything, but wouldn't it go a long way into establishing the credentials of self-pubbers so that we
I'm sure there are other things the association could/should do for the members. These were just random thoughts I had.
I'm excited to self-publish. But then again, I'm not doing it because I think i'll get rich, or I think traditional publishers are bad (on the contrary, I love traditional publishers). I'm just a control freak by nature, and I love the idea of building my OWN business and I like the idea of hard work. I could go on about it but you can read why I chose self-publishing on my blog below. (if you're interested, that's not the point - I'm getting sidetracked heh).
I've been a blogger for most of the last 3 years and that's how I earn my living. I've also had the benefit of other internet marketer associations to help with that. I thought it might be helpful to have such a thing for the indie pubbers.
PS: Don't bite my head off. It would just be an empty meal. Like Chinese fast food, you'll be hungry for another head later. =D
PPS: No getting head jokes. kk thx
I think the new dawn of self-publishing should have a membership group that does the following:
1. Requires a membership fee, yearly/monthly? And for that fee it
a) has a lawyer on retainer who serves DMCA notices and works on behalf of all writers in the association.
b) assists with legal advice for authors.
2. Requires a certain set of editing standards which include:a) Having all authors submit to standards of editing/self-editing/beta reading. (this is more difficult because it's costly, but I think there can be standards in place in regards to at least self-editing). Maybe at the bare minimum a proofreader/beta reader?
3. Requires certain etiquette standardsa) no commenting on reviews (period? negative reviews?) Unless there is a literal mistake in teh review (meaning the review posted in the wrong book - I've seen that happen.)
b) Rules on interacting with fans/reviewers/other authors.
I won't say this will fix anything, but wouldn't it go a long way into establishing the credentials of self-pubbers so that we
- Could be reviewed fairly and that reviewers would feel safe in posting reviews
- Could remove some of the stigma associated with self-publishing
- Could have an easier time with copyright infringement etc.
I'm sure there are other things the association could/should do for the members. These were just random thoughts I had.
I'm excited to self-publish. But then again, I'm not doing it because I think i'll get rich, or I think traditional publishers are bad (on the contrary, I love traditional publishers). I'm just a control freak by nature, and I love the idea of building my OWN business and I like the idea of hard work. I could go on about it but you can read why I chose self-publishing on my blog below. (if you're interested, that's not the point - I'm getting sidetracked heh).
I've been a blogger for most of the last 3 years and that's how I earn my living. I've also had the benefit of other internet marketer associations to help with that. I thought it might be helpful to have such a thing for the indie pubbers.
PS: Don't bite my head off. It would just be an empty meal. Like Chinese fast food, you'll be hungry for another head later. =D
PPS: No getting head jokes. kk thx