I was hoping if someone could help shed some light on a rather large dilemma I have regarding flashbacks.
I never knew flashbacks were so bad. I actually loved flashbacks and any narrative with one because I am the type that likes to see the events that lead to the current arc, and likes that interruption in action. Also, non-linear story lines intrigue me in general. Through research, I have learned that many disagree with me. The problem is the story I am writing is full of flashbacks, seven of them! And they probably span about 50 pages...They are rather integral to the plot because an antagonist sealed away the memories of a protagonist, and they come back in these flashback/reliving-the-memories-in-a-trance-state sequences, which are important for the plot's progression. He does this seven times, once per flashback.
I looked through some of the threads on here, and I reasoned that a way to follow the suggested advice and "bring the story to the present" is simply collect the flash backs when I am done with my rough draft, and shove them to the beginning of the novel. Delete the seven "flashback chapters," and somehow guide the reader into knowing exactly how much he remembers per trance without him reiterating everything. This is tricky, would require a lot of reworking, but that's basically the essence of being a writer and I'm up for it. However, this eliminates the reader from knowing no more than protagonist does; I devised a lot of suspenseful and shocking elements from his amnesia. That would go away if the audience knows of his memories before he does, right?
Should I be that writer who goes against the flow, does what he chooses, writes for nobody but himself, not care about the consequences, and keep my stinking flashbacks and withholding of information?
Or am I simply being stubborn, should accept that certain tropes are unacceptable, and not get so attached to my current story's flow.
Thanks for your help!!!
I never knew flashbacks were so bad. I actually loved flashbacks and any narrative with one because I am the type that likes to see the events that lead to the current arc, and likes that interruption in action. Also, non-linear story lines intrigue me in general. Through research, I have learned that many disagree with me. The problem is the story I am writing is full of flashbacks, seven of them! And they probably span about 50 pages...They are rather integral to the plot because an antagonist sealed away the memories of a protagonist, and they come back in these flashback/reliving-the-memories-in-a-trance-state sequences, which are important for the plot's progression. He does this seven times, once per flashback.
I looked through some of the threads on here, and I reasoned that a way to follow the suggested advice and "bring the story to the present" is simply collect the flash backs when I am done with my rough draft, and shove them to the beginning of the novel. Delete the seven "flashback chapters," and somehow guide the reader into knowing exactly how much he remembers per trance without him reiterating everything. This is tricky, would require a lot of reworking, but that's basically the essence of being a writer and I'm up for it. However, this eliminates the reader from knowing no more than protagonist does; I devised a lot of suspenseful and shocking elements from his amnesia. That would go away if the audience knows of his memories before he does, right?
Should I be that writer who goes against the flow, does what he chooses, writes for nobody but himself, not care about the consequences, and keep my stinking flashbacks and withholding of information?
Or am I simply being stubborn, should accept that certain tropes are unacceptable, and not get so attached to my current story's flow.
Thanks for your help!!!