Okay, so I'm making my way through Stephen King's latest novel (11/22/63) and I am enjoying it.
One think that didn't sound right as I read it though. I can't remember the exact sentence, so it's slightly paraphrased.
"Some teachers was sitting over in the corner..."
Now my immediate thoughts were that surely that must be "were" instead of "was".
I noticed the same "mistake" earlier in the novel.
I'm doubting my instincts on this one. I'm thinking Stephen - and his editor - must know something I don't know.
I did some googling and read up a little on the differene between "was" and "were".
I found out that "were" is used when stating conditions that aren't fact, and the opposite for "was".
But I still don't see how the example from the Stephen King novel is correct. It sounds all sorts of wrong to my ear. If it was just "teacher" then I would say using "was" would be correct.
Can anyone shed some light on this, please?
Thanks very much in advance.
One think that didn't sound right as I read it though. I can't remember the exact sentence, so it's slightly paraphrased.
"Some teachers was sitting over in the corner..."
Now my immediate thoughts were that surely that must be "were" instead of "was".
I noticed the same "mistake" earlier in the novel.
I'm doubting my instincts on this one. I'm thinking Stephen - and his editor - must know something I don't know.
I did some googling and read up a little on the differene between "was" and "were".
I found out that "were" is used when stating conditions that aren't fact, and the opposite for "was".
But I still don't see how the example from the Stephen King novel is correct. It sounds all sorts of wrong to my ear. If it was just "teacher" then I would say using "was" would be correct.
Can anyone shed some light on this, please?
Thanks very much in advance.