Naked Lunch by William Burroughs

cmi0616

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
1,802
Reaction score
141
Location
In the aeroplane over the sea
I tried to read William S Burroughs' Naked Lunch the other week, only to put it down after about 15 pages. I had no clue what was going on after another read through the beginning, and now I'm frustrated, so I've put it away for a while.

Can anyone attest to the hype that this book has gotten? Am I alone in my confusion?
 

stray

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
214
Reaction score
10
Location
Bangkok, Thailand
Website
jamesnewmanfiction.blogspot.com
Naked Lunch was mainly put together using exceprts from a bunch of letters that Burroughs wrote to his friend/agent and all-round bum-chum Allen Gingsberg in the mid to late 1950s. Burroughs had already published Junkie which was a much more approcahable novel. In Naked Lunch there is no overall plot, no character development, and no real overall theme. The book was popular because of its originality and its, at times, dazzling prose. It was post-modern fiction published at a time when the arts were continually breaking new ground. The fact that Burroughs was friends with Kerouac and Ginsberg also helped promote the book.
 

AyJay

Luv's Conscript
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
631
Reaction score
57
Age
56
Location
NYC
Website
andrewjpeterswrites.com
I read Naked Lunch when I was 18, drawn to anything provocative, drug-infused, and/or anti-establishment, and I thought it was amazing. Twenty+ years later, I think I'd have to be in the right mood to pick it up again. It's not my style of writing, and my brain has been trained to study plot and scene structure. Still, I recall there are terrific fantasy sequences in NL.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,159
Location
The right earlobe of North America
I tried to read William S Burroughs' Naked Lunch the other week, only to put it down after about 15 pages. I had no clue what was going on after another read through the beginning, and now I'm frustrated, so I've put it away for a while.

Can anyone attest to the hype that this book has gotten? Am I alone in my confusion?

You are not. Even back in my most intellectually experimental undergrad days, when I tried to read NL I found it a ridiculous exercise in fatuous self-indulgence. And I read a lot of Faulkner, Joe Conrad and Kurt Vonnegut during the same period, and retain great admiration for all of them.

caw
 

Dr.Gonzo

Wonderfully Irreverent
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
1,352
Reaction score
201
Location
Bat Country
I'm sure I remember reading somewhere that Burroughs would mix and splice his passages/pages to see what they became.
 

stray

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
214
Reaction score
10
Location
Bangkok, Thailand
Website
jamesnewmanfiction.blogspot.com
Dr. Gonzo,

You heard correct. That cut-up technique was actually discovered by Burroughs' artist friend Brion Gysin who was cutting up some newspaper articles one day with a stanley blade for fun and when he rearranged them he found that they created new words, new word-combos and new texts. He showed this to Burroughs who thought it to be a great literary invention (must of been the weed he was smoking at the time), and Burroughs went on to publish three full-length novels (The Soft Machine, The Ticket That Exploded, and Nova Express) using this, ahem, technique. He would use his own writings and those of famous writers such as Conrad. The basic method was to take a page of writing fold it four times and cut with a pair of sccisors. Repeat and rearrange the sections. He explained his new writing method to Sammual Beckett in a Parisan bar one night, and the Irishman lost his rag - 'That's plumbing not writing?' said Beckett - 'Words don't run around with brands on them, like cattle,' The mild mannered mid-western Burroughs replied. But it was a difficult technique to read. If you thought NL was tough to read then try reading the Nova Trilogy.

Funnily enough these cut-up novels brought Burroughs to the attention of the science-fiction community and in particular William Gibson, who lifted more than one idea from old Bill. William Burroughs also wrote a sc-fi film script called Blade-Runner, although it was not the script used for the film. The producers simply nicked the title.

On a historical note Burroughs' grandfather invented the adding machine, which meant that banks and accounts no longer had to do sums in their heads. This kind of technology later led to inventions like the computer. William Burroughs had this same need to invent and that is why I think he probably took the cut-ups method too far.

A very interesting person. Very intelligent and a great writer. His main failing was this chronic inability to write using plot and character development. He was a very important 20th century cult figure.
 
Last edited:

Dr.Gonzo

Wonderfully Irreverent
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
1,352
Reaction score
201
Location
Bat Country
Wow. Insightful :)

I have been meaning to read NL; it's not just on my shelf to look pretty. It's just one of those... you know, where you have intention to do something but keep stalling because you're scared? I've seen the film. I don't normally watch a film before I've read the book, but I heard they were really nothing alike in most ways and that the film is more of an ode to the book.

Reps coming for a great post.