Warning: major venting ahead 
After querying a large number of agents with my latest manuscript and getting nothing but rejections in return I noticed that quite a few of them have similar form letters that have really put a bee in my bonnet. These letters state that the agents were not sufficiently "excited" by my work to take on.
Now I don't mind the rejection - at this point in my writing career it's par for the course. What I do mind is agents sticking the boot in like this in a standard rejection letter.
When an agent rejects your work it's very obvious that they didn't like the manuscript, that it's not interesting to them or suitable for their list. Is it really necessary to imply that it's unexciting to drive these points home? What set me off was I got the same rejection from one of the major publishers today too. Did they all attend the same rejection letter seminar or what? How to Crush the Dreams of Budding Authors 101.
All I'm trying to say is that standard rejection letters should be
as gentle as possible, and I find this comment a bit harsh. If it was a personalized rejection letter in which they explained why my work wasn't sufficiently exciting to them I would be more than happy to take the feedback on board.
I know this is petty nitpicking at it worst, but I did warn that this was a rant, and what do you know, I feel a bit better now!
Is there anything that drives you crazy about agents / publishers and their rejections (apart from the bleeding obvious)

After querying a large number of agents with my latest manuscript and getting nothing but rejections in return I noticed that quite a few of them have similar form letters that have really put a bee in my bonnet. These letters state that the agents were not sufficiently "excited" by my work to take on.
Now I don't mind the rejection - at this point in my writing career it's par for the course. What I do mind is agents sticking the boot in like this in a standard rejection letter.
When an agent rejects your work it's very obvious that they didn't like the manuscript, that it's not interesting to them or suitable for their list. Is it really necessary to imply that it's unexciting to drive these points home? What set me off was I got the same rejection from one of the major publishers today too. Did they all attend the same rejection letter seminar or what? How to Crush the Dreams of Budding Authors 101.
All I'm trying to say is that standard rejection letters should be
as gentle as possible, and I find this comment a bit harsh. If it was a personalized rejection letter in which they explained why my work wasn't sufficiently exciting to them I would be more than happy to take the feedback on board.
I know this is petty nitpicking at it worst, but I did warn that this was a rant, and what do you know, I feel a bit better now!
Is there anything that drives you crazy about agents / publishers and their rejections (apart from the bleeding obvious)