Short Story Skeleton

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nexus

Evolute
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 1, 2011
Messages
330
Reaction score
32
Location
East Coast, USA
What does the skeleton of a short story look like? SHOULD it look like?

Obviously a human's femur isn't attached to the shoulder... there is a set structure to a human skeleton.

How are we expected to arrange the skeleton of a short story before we flesh it out?

Right now I am running under the assumption that a short story has less to work with than a novel. I assume that because a short story has significantly fewer words than a novel, this would be a fair enough assumption.

But then I remember that a short story can do things that a novel cannot. Namely, it can tell a story that a novel can't do justice to.

So, I find that a short story can do without much exposition. Is this a fair assumption (as long as the lack of exposition works within the story)?

I am nearly finished a short story that doesn't necessarily follow the typical standards I have found out there. Most shorts seem to set up an action sequence through as much exposition as possible. They just seem to take too much time.

Too many short stories I have read seem to abuse the thesaurus and impress me with new words rather than a fresh new story.

So what if my short starts with some tension from the first few sentences...

“More people are dying,” he whispered, leaning into the grey table. “Their bodies are drained of blood.”
So what if my story ends with a mystery to be solved by the reader. Is that a recipe for disaster?

How do you build your short story from the ground up?
 

SomethingOrOther

-
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Messages
1,652
Reaction score
608
How are we expected to arrange the skeleton of a short story before we flesh it out?
You're not. Write the first draft. Then, during revision, arrange it into the most effective "skeleton."

You seem to know a good amount about story structure. Here's what you should do: 1) Write a first draft; and, while doing so, don't worry too much about structure. 2) Set it aside for a while so that you can gain objectivity. You want to see your work from the same critical distance you'd see another writer's work. 3) Use your knowledge to shape the story into something effective.

Content dictates form. You won't know how to best structure your story until you write it and put it aside for a while.
 
Last edited:

Deirdre

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
889
Reaction score
159
Location
Menlo Park, CA
Website
deirdre.net
You're overthinking it.

Also, fwiw, I think the first paragraph would be more interesting without the second sentence.

For me, I need to have an idea of where I'm going in a short. I typically write a draft of the first scene, then I write the last. Then I write the parts in between.
 

Lady MacBeth

Out, damn'd spot! out, I say.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
2,476
Reaction score
289
Location
Canada
I agree. You are overthinking it. Just write the story. Worry about revisions later.

Also, your first sentence should probably give a name, rather than "he." And drop that last sentence. It gives away too much and takes away from the suspense.
 

Nexus

Evolute
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 1, 2011
Messages
330
Reaction score
32
Location
East Coast, USA
Sorry for the confusion guys - thats not the first sentence, although it is the first quote.

Thanks for your responses.
 

RobJ

Banned
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
2,677
Reaction score
306
You're making a number of basic assumptions. You say you read short stories, which is good, but maybe you'd benefit from reading a whole bunch more, and from a broader range than currently? Can't do you any harm. The more you read, the better the feel you get for how others have done things, though you're not constrained by what's gone before. I've read a great many shorts, and many of those didn't follow 'typical standards'. I think short stories are a great place for experimentation (depending on the market you're aiming for, of course: if your audience has expectations you usually ought to satisfy them).

The quote you provided doesn't appeal to me at all, but that's fine because it's just a tiny quote and I may not be in your target audience anyway.

Main point, as with everything, is to make it interesting. Start strong, finish strong, and don't let it sag in the middle.
 

BjornAbust

Banned
Joined
Feb 24, 2011
Messages
288
Reaction score
10
Location
In the weak and the wounded
Well, if you're concerned with the structuring of a short story, then perhaps Lester Dent's Master Plot Formula will be of interest to you. He was a prolific writer of pulp stories. While his formula may be a bit too, well, formulaic for some, it doesn't hurt to try and follow a pattern like this one when writing a story.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
The first rule of short story writing is simple. The story must be about something, and this something must matter to the protagonist.

Start the story by putting an interesting character in an interesting situation, meaning in trouble. Then let him work his way out of trouble. Start with a problem that needs solved, a question that needs answered, or both.

This is the opening. The ending comes when the situation has been resolved, the problem solved, and/or the question answered.

The middle is everything the character has to go through, all the obstacles he must get past, in order to resolve the situation, solve the problem, and/or answer the question.

I don't flesh out, for that matter. I sit down, find a title I like, the title gives me story, and the opening gives me direction. I just write the story without thinking about anything except resolving the situation, solving the problem, and/or answering the question. A three thousand word short story generally takes me four or five hours to write from the time I sit down until the final draft is finished.

I write short stories fast because I don't think about fleshing anything out, and I don't worry about a skeleton. I just tell a story, and the opening I write determines exactly what that story will be. It's the opening that provides the entire story that follows.

I actually like that sentence as an opening, though I, too, would add a name. Your ending is less common, and won't be popular with many readers. As a reader, I love a mystery I have to solve, but at the end of the story I want to know whether I was right or wrong. If you leave me hanging, I probably won't read you again.
 

jaksen

Caped Codder
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Messages
5,116
Reaction score
528
Location
In MA, USA, across from a 17th century cemetery
I like your beginning. I have no clue who 'he' is yet or what's going on exactly. Hopefully by reading on, I will discover that, and get involved in more issues, problems, predicaments, and so on.

As long as you resolve the main issue in your story, you can end your with an unanswered question or two - it makes your readers wander off thinking okay, but what about ...

I do this (sometimes) and my readers ain't complained yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.