egem said:
There is always something called implied author in every story (to the best of my knowledge). The unidentified narrator could be found there, but it gets tricky after that. Just as a tidbit: the movie Blade Runner has one of the best implied author scenes I’ve ever seen in a movie (the beginning) starting so far away [the narrator (unidentified director) is screaming “I have nothing to do with this world.]”
Interesting that you bring up Blade Runner in this context, because in the longer version, there
is a narrator. It is first person, the detective. This was always pretty weird to me that he was narrating in some parts, and yet the story starts somewhere he has no knowledge of. The novel is third person, but the narration was put it in to play up the sci-fi noir aspect.
Sc00t, I once read a novel by V.C. Andrews (perhaps not the best example, but the first one I thought of) that did switch first person narrators in the same chapter. She used line breaks, and put the name of the person speaking before the text. IMO, if you are going to do this, you
must identify the narrator
immediately. If you do not, you will probably confuse the reader to the point of taking him/her right out of the story. Actually, I would even go so far as to say that if you go to the next chapter, you still need to do this, because people usually assume it's going to be the same.
A friend of mine wrote a story that changed first person POV throughout. He used a name first every time he did it. Once, he used the name of a mother character who had not been named yet. (The story was mostly about teens, and she was only referred to as, "my mom.") He used her name, and it was very interesting, because you started out thinking she was one of the teenagers. Then, when you realized who she was, that association of thinking of her as a teen reflected a lot about her personality. She wasn't really grown up yet, so it was fitting to look at her the same way you looked at the kids.
As a direct response to your idea, I would suggest that you keep the POV the same until we see something
happen. I'm not really sure from your description, but it sounded like you were saying you wanted to start out with one characters thoughts, and move onto someone else's. But I think it would be better to have the first character talking about something really happening, and then another character present could go on and react to it.