Well, One year ago, I began to work on forming the basis for a zombie novel. With suggestions and character ideas from friends, and rigorous work, I, today, have a "Publish worthy" Part 0 (prolouge), Part 1, and 2, that all in total are 45,000 words. Their reception from peers I let read has been astonishing, and I've been told it's similar to what Ted Dekker writes. I grew up reading Tony Hillerman and Steven King, so I really don't know anything about Ted Dekker.
But recently, I've shoved myself into a moat for calling it a "Zombie story." Fact of the matter is, zombie stories are all too many now, even here, I see authors much like myself (perhaps older) who have published their stories, and I feel angst at what I thought had been a good idea. So many novels go published and gain little sales, and Publishers aren't necessarilly going to pay premium and take on the duty of selling... In reality, it's the author that does the selling, a Publisher is just the means to get the book printed and shipped...
I keep telling myself that it was a mistake to put so much onto the shaping of the book... Am I bull shitting to myself that it's pointless, or am I right in writing?
But recently, I've shoved myself into a moat for calling it a "Zombie story." Fact of the matter is, zombie stories are all too many now, even here, I see authors much like myself (perhaps older) who have published their stories, and I feel angst at what I thought had been a good idea. So many novels go published and gain little sales, and Publishers aren't necessarilly going to pay premium and take on the duty of selling... In reality, it's the author that does the selling, a Publisher is just the means to get the book printed and shipped...
I keep telling myself that it was a mistake to put so much onto the shaping of the book... Am I bull shitting to myself that it's pointless, or am I right in writing?