Good day 
So, I was plotting a short yesterday, finding a hook, a fresh spin, characters and whatnot... and I had an idea. I'm not reinventing the wheel or anything, but wondered what you guys would think of it. You know, if you'd like it.
The thing is, I'm constantly at war with myself regarding tense. I enjoy writing past and present from a first person POV. Sometimes I'll have a story that works better with one or the other, but not always. This is one of those times, leaving me wondering which one I should do. Why not do both? I thought. It snowballed from there. You see, what bothers me most about past tense is, where is the character now? How long ago was the story he/she is telling? And why is he/she telling it?
I decided on scene locations, picking ideal locations for the plot whilst keeping them fresh from each other. I don't like too many scenes in short stories. I'm aiming for around 5K, so about 3 or 4 will be fine.
To the point: Two scenes in one. The POV character will be in one scene while narrating what I planned to be the previous scene. I know this wouldn't always work, but the story I have planned has a drama that builds as a direct result of the scene that came before. As it should be. What I'm saying is that my POV character will have a reason to be narrating the previous scene because it's relevant with what's happening at present. Halving the scene breaks and keeping the story busy and moving on different levels. Two scenes unfolding together, drawing parallels with each other, and mixing the timeframe.
This also gives me an ideal twist at the end of the story, which is easy to create whilst being very fitting.
Like I say, I'm not reinventing the wheel, but I was wondering if this two scenes in one thingymabob sits well with you guys and girls?
So, I was plotting a short yesterday, finding a hook, a fresh spin, characters and whatnot... and I had an idea. I'm not reinventing the wheel or anything, but wondered what you guys would think of it. You know, if you'd like it.
The thing is, I'm constantly at war with myself regarding tense. I enjoy writing past and present from a first person POV. Sometimes I'll have a story that works better with one or the other, but not always. This is one of those times, leaving me wondering which one I should do. Why not do both? I thought. It snowballed from there. You see, what bothers me most about past tense is, where is the character now? How long ago was the story he/she is telling? And why is he/she telling it?
I decided on scene locations, picking ideal locations for the plot whilst keeping them fresh from each other. I don't like too many scenes in short stories. I'm aiming for around 5K, so about 3 or 4 will be fine.
To the point: Two scenes in one. The POV character will be in one scene while narrating what I planned to be the previous scene. I know this wouldn't always work, but the story I have planned has a drama that builds as a direct result of the scene that came before. As it should be. What I'm saying is that my POV character will have a reason to be narrating the previous scene because it's relevant with what's happening at present. Halving the scene breaks and keeping the story busy and moving on different levels. Two scenes unfolding together, drawing parallels with each other, and mixing the timeframe.
This also gives me an ideal twist at the end of the story, which is easy to create whilst being very fitting.
Like I say, I'm not reinventing the wheel, but I was wondering if this two scenes in one thingymabob sits well with you guys and girls?